I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.


I just can't clear my head of this. I don't want to start a measurements vs listening war and I'd appreciate it if you guys don't, but I bought a Rogue Sphinx V3 as some of you may remember and have been enjoying it quite a bit. So, I head over to AVS and read Amir's review and he just rips it apart. But that's OK, measurements are measurements, that is not what bugs me. I learned in the early 70s that distortion numbers, etc, may not be that important to me. Then I read that he didn't even bother listening to the darn thing. That is what really bugs me. If something measures so poorly, wouldn't you want to correlate the measurements with what you hear? Do people still buy gear on measurements alone? I learned that can be a big mistake. I just don't get it, never have. Can anybody provide some insight to why some people are stuck on audio measurements? Help me package that so I can at least understand what they are thinking without dismissing them completely as a bunch of mislead sheep. 

128x128russ69

@onhwy61 

 

I think the implication is that some people like the sound of audible artifacts. I think I may have in the past. If you make them measure well you lose the artifacts.

I think the implication is that some people like the sound of audible artifacts. I think I may have in the past. If you make them measure well you lose the artifacts.

Oy vey!

I guess I’m just not picking up the logic here. Oh well, nonetheless I do appreciate and respect everyone’s point of view on this topic.

Charles

I have to say this. No one is going to beat a dead horse. I just cleaned up after two and if that is an indication of what is inside, YOU AIN'T gonna beat any dead horse.

WOW, what has my wife been feeding them. Holy$hit! I think the oats fermented to long. The pig farm is not helping...

 I believe audiophiles should not have to accept poorly measuring equipment.  

Thanks for posting. This thread was designed to help me understand people that rely on measurements above what they hear. You make a good point but if an amp or whatever sounds good even though it has measurements different than some other amps is that amp no good? Should it be dismissed without listening? Are we measuring the right things?  Is looking at .01% difference important? Is distortion that is not audible important? We don't prefer distortion, we just don't think inaudible distortion is important.  Are we wrong? 

We appear to be measuring the right things, some people like less perfect reproduction. They like the imperfect artifacts. That is not bad.