Overheating conductors in walls is a major cause of house fires so you are correct but then you did prove my point. The grounding scheme in residential construction is designed to protect property not people it’s a well known fact and as I said you just backed that up.
No, I did not back that up. I said that **the breaker** protects against fires in the walls due to overheating conductors, not the grounding scheme. As I said in the last paragraph of my preceding post, "under most circumstances the safety ground conductor has no involvement in the fire protection provided by a breaker."
I also explained how the grounding scheme, specifically the safety ground connection, protects against electrical shock in the event that the AC "hot" wiring within an electrical device shorts to its metallic chassis (if it has a metallic chassis), by causing the breaker to trip before anyone has a chance to come in contact with the "hot" chassis. That is why 3-prong outlets and 3-prong power plugs (on devices that are not "double insulated"), which provide a safety ground connection, replaced 2-prong types (which don't provide a safety ground connection) many decades ago.
I agree, of course, with your statement that "GFCIs will react and kick in milliseconds not seconds and are designed to protect people." However your preceding post, to which I was responding, stated that...
If there is current on the chassis and someone touches it the breaker is probably not going kick in time to save someone. Only a GFCI which is designed to protect people may save someone from a shock or electrocution.
... which as I explained is not a correct statement.
Regards,
-- Al