Is it possible to really know what you're doing?


Somehow I managed to select components that are getting along and feel comfortable with how things are sounding after many upgrades.  I rely on others to advise along the way. I'm very good at asking questions.

Every facet of a set up is quite complicated.  Even power cord's can be challenging.  Name recognition is very important and there are so many names.

The technical aspects of everything involved is clearly overwhelming and requires a lot to barely understand.  I've learned enough to know that I really don't understand a lot.  At least I'm able to appreciate what I'm listening to which is all that really matters, and know if something sounds good.

Just my thoughts for what they are worth.

emergingsoul

@emergingsoul said: "...does anyone really understand what they’re buying absent being an engineering tech savvy individual....

I think if it were based purely on engineering, one could do this in what I referred to above as a "holistic" approach, using specs and compatibility, room analysis and the like. My experience has been that every piece of equipment has some characteristic (coloration?)* that requires a more nuanced approach to matching pieces to achieve a result that works as a system. And that doesn’t even address room acoustics and placement (which again, can be done remotely by analysis but ultimately, to me, is also fine tuning by ear). 

I addressed your original question by observing that I don’t have an holistic approach to system building, since I need to hear the various components in combination in a given room, taking account of set up and placement. I readily admit I’m a subjectivist and don’t rely on specs or measurements alone, though I respect the engineering aspects and some of the basic issues like matching speaker and appropriate amp, impedance, gain, etc. 

*One thing I've observed on my journey in audio is that you often don't know there is a coloration until it is absent. That is often a revelation. 

@whart 

Thoughtful comments.

I dare say you know what you're doing.  Awesome Horn speakers and a turntable and everything else speaks highly of the wisdom you possess.

What a lovely space you have.

 

@devinplombier 

I would say that the first step is for a person to determine what type of speakers they prefer. That is, not brand or model; but rather speaker architecture. 

Is it open baffle? Planar? Stand-mount with subs? Active or passive?

Agree 100% - speakers are the most important component because of their inherent colourations and interference effects of drivers with each other and with the room.  But you missed a very important consideration - are they designed to emulate a point source of sound?

Answering this simple question can eliminate 99% of speakers!  Not to mention, antagonising the 99% of audiophiles who own those speakers. 

There is an interesting viewpoint on MBL's website: Company

On questions like the OP posted, the subject is always in the context on one's system. A generality. The most important contributing factor is the room.

@lanx0003 

I agree that a reference / standard needs to be established.  ... This includes precise imaging—where each sound source is rendered with a clear, stable, and locational presence within the soundstage

Those of us who mainly listen to ’classical’ music do indeed have a reference / standard in live, unamplified performances in concert hall acoustics. 

These concert hall acoustics however do not offer a clear locational presence within a soundstage especially if several performers are playing simultaneously.

Try a large-scale Mahler symphony where at times over 100 musicians are playing simultaneously, often loudly.  Even when Mahler throttles back to say, a mandolin solo, the hall acoustics still dominate directivity!  See the MBL reference in my previous post ...