******"First, the fact that any one listener cannot “hear” African rhythms as the listener knows and understands them in jazz does not mean that those rhythms are not there; or, at least, serve as the foundation for those jazz rhythms as they are understood. It is like insisting that European based chord progressions and harmony do not exist in the music because the listener cannot hear them as such."******
The Frogman is saying that just because we amateurs(you & me) can't hear the African stuff as we understand African stuff, i.e. Hollywood, that does not mean the African stuff is not there.
That's a fair statement.
HOWEVER, I have asked The Frogman on many occasions to post a clip of Jazz in which he can then point out to us the African stuff as we listen. Of course he would also have to compare it with indigenous African music from the 17th century. Nothing!
Apparently he is accepting this stuff on blind faith.
Food for thought. Back in the 20s and early 30s, white people said they had invented Jazz. Where was the African crowd then? Just asking.
Cheers
The Frogman is saying that just because we amateurs(you & me) can't hear the African stuff as we understand African stuff, i.e. Hollywood, that does not mean the African stuff is not there.
That's a fair statement.
HOWEVER, I have asked The Frogman on many occasions to post a clip of Jazz in which he can then point out to us the African stuff as we listen. Of course he would also have to compare it with indigenous African music from the 17th century. Nothing!
Apparently he is accepting this stuff on blind faith.
Food for thought. Back in the 20s and early 30s, white people said they had invented Jazz. Where was the African crowd then? Just asking.
Cheers