Klemperer Mahler 7 mystery?
The 7th seems to alternate between day & night and is all about "mood". This said, I prefer Bernstein’s 1966 over Klemperer’s --even though it’s faster it seems to be better at bringing out the moodiness. I heard another superb live performance with Sir Simon Rattle conducting the Berlin PO (I think)-- recorded in the late 90s Finally there's Tennstedt's live recording from the early 80s, nice but not quite up there with the others IMO. |
how did Bernstein II fare? And yes, @jasonbourne52 , Boulez Seventh is excellent |
Klemperer often used very brisk tempi in his early recordings. My mom was a teenager when he conducted the LA Phil in the late 1930s, attended every concert she could, and remarked on the "high energy". That he evolved into such a deeply introspective musician is remarkable. His Bruckner 6th was my favorite performance, 3 minutes longer than most and the deeply satisfying. Then I heard Celibidache's, even slower by an additional 4 minutes. Los Angeles always had great instrumentalists, especially after the mass exodus from Nazi Germany. Hollywood, then featuring orchestral soundtracks, offered many jobs and top pay. The Philharmonic was always a potentially truly great orchestra, but for some reason never had a permanent conductor of immense stature. I saw Solti conduct several times in the ’60s, when I was a teenager. He agreed to be main conductor, and I attended his first concert as new leader. Before the program started, the Manager came onstage and announced that Solti had cancelled. However, a new conductor would step in — Zubin Mehta. Beethoven’s 7th was the main piece. Solti was apparently so insulted he cancelled his contract, and Mehta inherited the podium. I veered a bit off-topic, sorry — this is about Otto. |
I think I see what you are trying to comune here but I tend to think that the 7th is a flawed child of Mahlers. I have yet to hear any conductor make anything of this symphony because it is so disproportionate from movement to movement and he was trying to bring in non orchestral instruments like the mandolin which requires most of the orchestra to hold back and I just don't think it works. I really think Klemperer wanted to say that even Mahler wasn't perfect. |
I've read this too, which is one of the reasons why I keep trying to grasp what Klemperer tried to communicate with the 7th. He took his time in the other Mahler recordings (although his first movement of no.2 is quickly paced) but this 7th is such an odd performance it falls apart completely. Klemperer much have been concious of this, which is why I tend to believe it was intentional. But what was his intention? |
Yes the tempos that Klemperer used do tend to be quite a bit slower than the rest of his contemories like Bruno Walter and Mengelberg but if you read any of the biographies of Mahler it is no coincidence to find out that Mahler himself tended to conduct his symphonies a lot slower himself so I do tend to like his symphonies with a little breathing space. |
