Lou Reed/Metallica "Lulu" just awful


Just checked out Lou Reed's latest album Lulu. He is backed by Metallica. Lulu may be one of the worst albums of all time.As a long time Reed fan I am willing to give him a certain amount of artistic license. However, this offering is simply unlistenable.
maxnewid
Don't know anything about this record, but it will have to be pretty damn awful to supplant Metal Machine Music as Reed's worst ever.

When Lou's on his game, he's damn near unbeatable - but MMM is all-time stinker.
For those that really know Lou's history...they'll know that he maliciously released Metal Machine Music...to bitterly fulfill a contract... the album was purposely bad (a double album of distortion). He thought it was clever because people would take it as serious art (and the joke would be on them...and the record company). Well this album wasn't supposed to be a joke...and it's probably worse.

I've never verified this personally...but supposed some copies of the album were purposely pressed so the arm would not move far enough to lift automatically. It would not surprise me because he can be such a #$%^weed.
At least he tries and does new things. The Raven CD comes to mind.

So many musicians recycle the same stuff over and over again. How interesting is that.

MMM was in fact put out to satisfy contractual obligations. He owed two LPs so he put out a double LP of feedback loops with artsy liner notes. Each side was one second above the bare minimum required for an album per his contract.

I laugh when I see that RCA released a 24 karat CD remaster of it. Barnum was right.
For the record, I am aware of the history of MMM. I'm also aware that Lou Reed has - to this day - denied the story. I doubt that he has liability concerns these days, but he may still be being cheeky.

Either way, I wasn't commenting on the intent behind the release of MMM, merely that it sucks.

Marty