MQA is for chumps


128x128fuzztone
My impression is also that MQA was developed as a way to sell the public on the idea of compressed files as being "lossless".
@fuzztone 
 I'll take heed on your advice, thanks. If/when I get another DAC I like for it's properties alone, and by chance it includes MQA, fine. It will give me something to play with and offer hands on advice later up the road.
I quickly ended my Tidal subscription  and went to Qobuz.   I thought my DAC sounded better than my Vault's analog outs with MQA tracks.   

Radio Paradise just started streaming MQA content.   So I clicked on an MQA "station" and fed the digital stream to my DAC.   Played it fine , sound was pretty good.... the DAC identified the stream as " 88.2"....

Can anyone explain this??
Fuzz
”Well and good except for the MQA has your money in the form of the license fee. They have mine too and I’ve never even tried it, even during a crappy Tidal trial.”

Same here. Doing a Deezer trial now - so far so good. 
Should be interesting to see how Spotify responds to this, after they take a closer look at this marker. 
More to discover