Occam's Razor: The Signal to Noise Ratio


Occam's Razor can be paraphrased as "the best explanation is the simplest one". In the case of audio, I suggest the best "explanation" for the best sound is the highest signal to noise ratio. We commonly pursue this with equipment topology, vibration isolation for turntables, electronics and speakers, electrical isolation with dedicated circuits, component isolation, cable hygiene and all our other efforts to eliminate noise pollution. I believe it extends well beyond this, culminating not in what comes out of the speaker, where I think many folks stop, but rather what finally hits our ears. This means wave interference in the listening room is one of our largest noise contributors.

 

I have been fortunate in having the time and means to curate a nice system, but I recognized that it would never deliver the best SNR if the signal that leaves the speaker is corrupted by the noise created as it careens throughout the room before it reaches my ear. Over the last few months, I have added room treatments that together cost more than any one single component in my system.  I initially paid attention to first reflections, creating what I call the “circle of silence” with absorption on the walls, ceiling and floor. I also directed my efforts towards speaker boundary interference response with appropriate placement of the speakers and listening position. Bass traps and a distributed bass array deal with uneven lower bass response. Not wanting to dull the room with overabsorption, I added pure diffusion or a combination of diffusion and absorption.

 

What I now have is a system that not only provides a very accurate signal, but one that is not muddied by all of the other signals (noise) bouncing off the room surfaces.  Instruments and voices are clear with an obvious start and stop. While the system always had decent width and height, they are greater now.  The most significant contribution is that the soundstage now extends in front of and far behind the speakers. On a good rock recording, I can place the drum set, the bass, the keyboard, the vocalists and the guitars three-dimensionally. Classical and jazz are even more remarkable. It is stunning and at times, even startling.

 

I recognize that not everyone has a room they can devote to their audio pursuits, but within your means and what you and yours find socially acceptable, you should do everything you can to attend to the noise your room adds to your pure and pristine signal. Fuses, power cords, cables, amplifier design, speaker type, etc., all pale in comparison. No matter how your particular equipment tastes run, if you were to put your system in my room, it would likely sound better.

 

Bottom line, defend and protect your hard won signal from all the noise throughout the entire reproduction process. Everything counts, especially the room.

 

tcutter

My apologies for how I ended the previous post and how it might appear.  I should have said "the signals in your head are your business and yours alone". 

Perlman On Heifetz

Here's my example of SNR - Heifetz freewheelin' it. I remember Perlman also saying upon Heifetz's death that he  played like "lava."

Heifetz Plays Sibelius

 

Heifetz is so above most musicians, than someday i remember listening to him in a quintet of Schubert and it will not be my reference version even if i liked it for sure because Heifetz perfect sound control put him unvolontarily in the front seat... It was more a concerto with a soloist than a quintet... It was not his fault his mastery and perfection sound exceed most... I was hearing a concerto for Heifetz not so much Schubert quintet ... 😊

it was thirty years ago and i cannot forget it so astounding and surprizing it was for me ...

Sometimes a musician touch something near perfection ...But it can be detrimental in a way when playing with the others who are more casual ordinary mortals...😁

He represent perhaps more than everyone absolute mastery of violin ...it is not even debatable or about taste... Ask any violinist...

My favorite violin works is Szeryng Bach sonata first version ....But the Sibelius with Haifetz match it for sure ... No one beat Heifetz...But here in Bach Szering is beside him or not far... Nobody ever beat this Bach interpretation anyway in power of expression for me  ... None...Even the Heifetz god...Music is than more than SNR or perfection , it is also  some  controlled "imperfection" called "expression" ...

 

 

Indeed you are right.

I was actually making a little funny with this topic. Artists like Heifetz and Artur Rubenstein sometimes caught grief for twiddling a bit with the notes by subtly re-writing and spontaneously improvising and embellishing what was "on the page." Rubenstein would take improvisational liberties with Chopin sonatas and was accused of creating "noise." So, their signal-to-noise ration could be said to have triumphed noise over signal even though this is not quite analogous to the discussion about electronics.