Pre-amps with seperate power supplies .....

Garebear, I realize it is an umbilical cord. I was responding to a comment made about cost cutting and power cords were used as an example.

I would go with the engineers at Classe Audio and use the original umbilical cord. I think they know what they are doing. If you have any doubts give them a call.

"I think they know what they're doing"
They know exactly what they're doing and part of this decision making
includes economic considerations (with some companies it isn't the
engineer's call to make). Even expensive components can be built with very

average part quality to stay within a pre determined budget target. The
builders working with these cost limitations are able to produce good
sounding and competitive products. Those components can be easily
elevated to very good and excellent levels with well chosen better parts.

It you're satisfied with the choices made in choosing parts then that's fine.
As Grannyring astutely pointed out, there's is often room for improvement
(sometimes significant) as an individual isn't hampered with the same cost
constraints for their specific audio system. As I noted before the issue of
part quality varies from one builder/ company to another. This is why many
companies will offer upgrade packages (better, caps, resistors,
transformers, tubes, wiring etc.). They recognize much better quality is
available but the cost puts it outside the price target of the standard level
components (for example V cap or ultra grade resistors options).

It's a personal choice and I believe options to improve/upgrade is a good
thing, your call.
Regards,

I have a Cary SLP05 preamp that has a separate power supply connected by an umbilical cord. I tried the RAL replacement and found the stock cord to be far superior. In all fairness, I probably didn't give the RAL umbilical enough time to break in but to my ears, it sounded horrible

Regarding the engineers at Classé knowing what they're doing, I recall a communication I had with the company many years ago. I had just purchased a new Classé amp that came with their $180.00 "Reference AC Linecord", a modest cable with a Schurter IEC plug on the amp end, and $3.00 yellow Eagle brand male plug on the wall end. Taken aback, I sent off a letter questioning their choice of an el-cheapo plug on a so-called "reference" cord. I received back a nice letter from a vice president at Classé stating that they had carefully auditioned a variety of AC plugs available at the time, both expensive and inexpensive, and found the modest Eagle plug to be the all-around best performer.

"As Grannyring astutely pointed out, there's is often room for improvement (sometimes significant) as an individual isn't hampered with the same cost constraints for their specific audio system."

Just what cost constraints do you think Classe Audio had when building the OP's $8,000 preamp? I always find it interesting, how many people think they know more than the specialty engineers designing high end audio equipment.

Gbart's post is a good illistration of how the cost of parts is not an indication of their worthyness in a specific application.

I know of at least one company that performed mods on many high end components. Their mods consisted of changing caps from the originals to much more expensive caps. This company destroyed the sound of some of the best equipment ever made. Thankfully they are now out of business. Hopefully never to return.

Grannyring said "Yes it would make a nice improvement" This is bad advice. He has no clue if it will make any improvement at all and there is a good chance it would sound worse at the OP's expense of course.

This appears to be the era of mod happy audiophiles. I can see modifying a Sony CD player if you are not concerned about getting the mod money back, but modifying the best equipment from the best companies is ludicrous. If you don't like it you should buy something else because it will eventually end up on the used market and I don't want to end up with it.