Dear Halcro: ++++ " The real point of all this is that Raul selected the Stevenson alignment (which he doesn't use himself)........to prove that my 233mm P to S distance is 0.3mm out?
Instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald)........he will grasp at the ridiculous to avoid admitting defeat? " +++++
wrong again, a misunderstood. I don't took Stevenson ( FR took it. ) to prove that you are out for 0.3mm because as you admit you has an overhang of 12mm ( to match the 66. ): you showed in the calculator link you posted!!
++++ " instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald). " +++++
wrong again, Baerwald ( IEC/DIN ) does not shows 12mm on overhang with 233 on StP distance. Where do you read it?
Btw, in no one of the posts that gentleman could prove any of his theories, I have the posts.
Now, don't talk prove what you post. Bla, bla, bla,.. means nothing: where are those facts that are the foundation of your posts?
In the other side the discussion is between you and me: why brought here the name of a third or fourth person trying to convince ( your self because you can't convince any one else. ) or prove what you can't do it because your whole subject misunderstood? or only are trying to distract from the main subject: your misunderstood.
Just for your records here a discussion between your third/hero person and other agoner on tonearms:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&255&4#255
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&256&4#256
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&276&4#276
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&277&4#277
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&278&4#278
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&280&4#280
three times in a row in the same thread your hero was defeated.
Have you enough or will come back for more?
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.
Instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald)........he will grasp at the ridiculous to avoid admitting defeat? " +++++
wrong again, a misunderstood. I don't took Stevenson ( FR took it. ) to prove that you are out for 0.3mm because as you admit you has an overhang of 12mm ( to match the 66. ): you showed in the calculator link you posted!!
++++ " instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald). " +++++
wrong again, Baerwald ( IEC/DIN ) does not shows 12mm on overhang with 233 on StP distance. Where do you read it?
Btw, in no one of the posts that gentleman could prove any of his theories, I have the posts.
Now, don't talk prove what you post. Bla, bla, bla,.. means nothing: where are those facts that are the foundation of your posts?
In the other side the discussion is between you and me: why brought here the name of a third or fourth person trying to convince ( your self because you can't convince any one else. ) or prove what you can't do it because your whole subject misunderstood? or only are trying to distract from the main subject: your misunderstood.
Just for your records here a discussion between your third/hero person and other agoner on tonearms:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&255&4#255
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&256&4#256
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&276&4#276
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&277&4#277
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&278&4#278
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&280&4#280
three times in a row in the same thread your hero was defeated.
Have you enough or will come back for more?
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.