Receiver

The NADs mentioned do have pre-out jacks, so they should have active preamps (they were designed so you could upgrade your amplifier to one of NAD's amplifiers, like the 2200 I used. I owned a 7240, and it was a very nice receiver. Much more dynamic than its 40 watt rating would lead you to believe; same with the 7175's 75 watts. Lynne's caution about the caps in the receiver is a good one as well. Ultimately, I'd suggest, as Yogiboy and others have, that you try it in your system. But give it a bit of time, at least a couple of days, to warm up and break back in.

Thanks to all. I guess, ultimately, my concern was whether or not the NAD would the power to drive my speakers since HK has a higher WPC. I also have a mint NAD 7240 pe I bought decades ago, pre children.

I'll have to take an afternoon hook up the various receivers and listen.
Good advise on the capacitors, I wouldn't have thought of that. My greatest concern had been power to "open up" my speakers.

Thanks. rh

I would sell all three, then many good options depending on budget. The older gear loses much as the caps dry out and other parts wear out.

What would you suggest as a receiver replacement? Thanks

Depends on budget and do you need a receiver as opposed to an integrated amp? My current preferences are Portal Panache, Naim Nait 5i-2, Primare I21, YBA YC201, all under $900. I either own or have owned all of those. I like to use with a vintage tuner.