Sound quality of Roon

Roon has a free trial and you can run the core on your PC or Mac for a trial. I personally love Roon, I have found it to be the best interface to listen to Tidal and Qobuz for sound quality as well as the numerous features Roon gives you access to.

I ran it on my Mac for the first few months and then invested in a $600 Intel NUC. Besides the maintenance of blowing out any dust in the NUC every few months, it has worked perfectly.

You have a terrific multiband Parametric Equalizer built into the software and with an investment of some time, you will find you can use it to equalize for your speaker environment or your headphones.

There are multiple filters as well as crossfeed, convolution, and more if desired. It's scalable so if you just want to use it for its capabilities to upsample music or just its Wiki type click for a veritable encyclopedia of music, the various versions which have the best resolution. Too much for a reply. No cost to try but it's worth the $12 to give it a fair shake, Either incorporate your music library or just use Tidal and or Qobuz.

Nothing to lose and a world of enhancements to gain. I have nothing invested in Roon, I can't see any negatives except the cost, If you have a good pair of headphones, you will notice the enhancements in SQ. Try it out nothing to lose- I am obviously a fan and using the NUC you can have multiple people in your home listen to multiple devices- an iPad, iPhone, Android, PC, or Mac. It's all good and the NUC is definitely a great way to go if you are comfortable installing an OS and have some technical acumen. I have no noise with my NUC- you still need a DAC and AMP. My 2¢

Comparing to ripped cd's, local files certainly is good way to ascertain sound quality.

Not sure I believe these music players don't have unique sound quality, many  report they do. I recall hearing unique sound qualities when I initially switched from Audirvana to Roon.

Roon is definitely the best overall.  Yes, quirky and unstable with limited support resources, but no doubt an amazing experience when working properly.

the thing is it takes a long time to optimize sound quality with Roon.  And when you benchmark sound quality, you need to use Roon with a streamer.

I must say that I agree with Grannyring, I have tried Roon for many years and it is the best music mgmt software yet available. That said, however, I believe it falls short of the mark as it relates to SQ. Not bad but certainly not setting any benchmarks. That's a shame, because I believe that Roon is capable of making significant improvements in SQ but for whatever reason has not made this a high priority. Now that I said that, let me explain my experience with my system and other high end systems that I listen to frequently from my audiophile friends. My system consists for an Innuos Zenth Mk II SE, Innuos Phoenix reclocker, Optical Module, Etheregen, Ansuz C2 power distribution and cables etc. I have used Roon, Ipeng9, Euphony, Audiavarna (not all on my server) but on other very high end servers with high end LPS. My experience has been that the Innuos OS sounds significantly better than Roon on my server and Euphony sounded better as well on other high end servers I have done critical listing on. The great thing about Innuos as a company, is that they are very committed to continued improvement of their software and hardware; specifically as it relates to function, features and in particular, sound quality. Their customer service is excellent as well. I am pleased with the investment I have made and continue to increase my enjoyment and satisfaction with every new update. I should have mentioned previously, that I am not a dealer, nor have any financial interest in any way with Innuos. I hope this was helpful.

After reading the comments on this post, one thing has become clear.

There is no consensus on the benefits of Roon, in fact, it seems to me that people hear what they want to hear.

My belief is that people subliminally convince themselves that the money they spent was worth it.

I'm not saying that there was or wasn't an improvement. What I am saying is that the person paying for it "wants" to feel that it was money well spent.

I believe that the reality of the situation is that there are a lot of components that are excellent, but looked at individually, aren't significantly better than what the other guy bought.

Think about it.

Every time an OP asks for recommendations for a component, there are dozens of responses from Audiogoners extolling the virtues of component X, Y or Z. To me this is proof that the differences between components is minimal once a certain level is achieved.