The Harbeth phenomenon


In my search for a new pair of speakers, I've gone through many threads here and noticed that many owners or fans of Harbeth have almost a love-like connection with Harbeth speakers. It is almost as if the speakers cast a spell upon them. I know many audiophiles love their speakers but Harbeth owners seem especially enamored with theirs. I am extremely puzzled by this phenomenon because on paper Harbeth speakers look average at best and lack many of the attributes that generally make a great speaker.

Their sensitivity of generally around the 86dB mark makes them rather inefficient and therefore, at least in theory, not a good match for many lower powered tube amps, or any amps below 100wpc. Their frequency range is simply inferior to most high-end speakers since they don't go below 40 Hz. This alone should, again at least in theory, disqualify Harbeth speakers from consideration as top high end speakers. And yet I've never heard anyone complain about their bass, while people complain about lack of bass in the Gibbon Nines from DeVore, which is a fantastic speaker. Their cabinets look like a cheap DIY enclosure (disclaimer: I've never seen a Harbeth up close, only pictures). The 7ES-3 is rated B-Restricted, while the smaller and cheaper Usher Be-718 A-Restricted in Stereophile but garners nowhere near the same amount of admiration, praise and following among audiophiles.

So what's going on here? Is this a big conspiracy plot by the company that paid off a few hundred of people to infiltrate audiophile internet forums and a few reviewers? I am of course joking here, but the question is serious. How can speakers so average on paper be so good in real life? I know the opposite is often true, but you rarely see this phenomenon.

Please speak up.
actusreus
It's good, the Harbeth. I attempted to dislodge it with another high end speaker Marten from Sweden but failed in the process of doing so. I ended up keeping both. It's good for life, the Harbeth.
I feel it and it is why I dream about them.... :)

But for the price Mission Cyrus are very good.... :)
I need to go to some bank with some mask and....


my best to you ryder….
I own a pair of 30,1 and I liked their tonal accuracy and staging, I listen to a very large variety of music at live volumes and yes they are very tough to drive at these high levels in particular... I added a pair on JL E110 to complement, made a huge difference for stage and room dimensions and to recreate live experience.
I also owns pair of Magico V3 on my main system and they are in another league altogether (price wise too)
I would suggest tube preamp and SS amp to people interested in buying Harbeth 30,1 even more so if they use a digital source as their main source, they can be clinical and dry with revealing DAC combined with poor recordings...
Although I like my Harbeth I do not qualify as a dye hard fan, so many good products out there, musical preference will affect your choice 
Harbeths sound great to me! Thats the only test / spec that I need; my ears.  At low to medium volumes , the sound is exquisite. 
Boxy Harbeth is very old school looking and not nearly as much competition there as in other newer designs. . I think that is part of it

I’ve heard the latest 40.2 model in a very good dealer setup and liked the sound and looks but would be hard pressed to  go for the asking price. Not to say I would not at least consider it.