Halcro
maybe the reason is down to incompatable effective mass of the arm cart combo?
maybe the reason is down to incompatable effective mass of the arm cart combo?
The Palladian-A step beyond
The new cartridge from Acoustical Systems may finally be the LOMC to fully realise the theoretical advantages of the genus.
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
- ...
- 391 posts total
A stiffer cantilever suspension could well mean less cantilever movement and more tonearm vibration. That's what I think most folk believe, thus putting more stress in the tonearm...... I'm still not totally convinced 🤔 Surely attaching an accelerometer to a tonearm to produce graphic evidence of the stresses would not be difficult? I'm sure Continuum did.... |
maybe the reason is down to incompatable effective mass of the arm cart combo? The FR-66s has the highest effective mass of any commercial tonearm produced. If there were no audible compatibility issues with it, plus its little brother FR-64s plus the DV-507/II plus the SAEC WE-8000/ST.....I can't see effective mass being the reason....? At any rate, it was not a low-frequency problem or arm vibration that ruled out the other tonearms. |
Sampsa 55, ''Implies'' is logical conclusion, not a conjecture''. This is correct provided we provided the premisse from which the conclusion follow. The logic state that a conclusion is true if the premisse is also true. But logic does not decide about the ''real truth''. Meanings or sense are about languge such that we understand what is stated. We need in addition the reference to the reality . The so called ''correspondence'' between statements and reality. However ''corespondence'' should not be seen as ''identity relation'' . This was the reason for Frege's curious invention that statements refer to truth values: the truth OR the false. Wittgenstein stated: ''for two things to say that they are identical make no sense and to say that everything is identical with its self say nothing''. |
Nandric, First of all, to imply is an English verb meaning by suggestion or supposition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/imply Infer means to conclude from evidence, not imply. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/infer *** ''Implies'' is logical conclusion, not a conjecture''. This is correct provided we provided the premisse from which the conclusion follow. The logic state that a conclusion is true if the premisse is also true.*** Not quite. The premise can be true and the conclusion false if the argument is faulty. This is like reading pedantic nonsense. Any statement or argument is true if you prove it to be so, or might be true without proof to the contrary. Taking one word out of context and changing the meaning of a statement or paragraph is a fallacy in itself. |
- 391 posts total