Top down or bottom up? Just asking...
This is a purely theoretical question that
I’m tossing out just to learn what folks might say.
Consider, say, Magico and Wilson Audio.
Their top speakers are in 6 figures, but their ‘bottom’ ones go as low as 10k.
Consider, say, Monitor Audio and Paradigm. Their bottom is very low 4 figures
or lower; their top in the low 30s.
Now, wouldn’t it stand to reason that other
things being equal a 20-30k speaker from Wilson or Magico would be better than
the same from the other firms? The upper firms have all that top level
technology to scale down, while MA and Para would be at the top of their game
in the 20-30 range.
Obviously, there are other issues—personal
taste being the most important. And room size and other components.
But ‘all things being equal’ isn’t the
answer clear? What am I missing?
P.s. I am a very happy owner of MA PL100II,
which I got half price used here at less than a year old. And of B and W CM9 I
got 10 years ago. I’m just wondering…