Thanks Atmasphere. That is the kind of relevant response I was hoping for.
I guess I have no doubt its possible. But can can any good quality vinyl rig track those well? How hard is it and what does it take? Does it take an audiophile vinyl setup to track modern pop recordings like these well? Cost?
Just wondering. Most all my vinyl is old releases, 1980s and older so I don’t have much to go on.
I think I still have the old Telarc Firebird vinyl release from teh early days of digital vinyl mastering with the big dynamics that took a very well thought out rig to track. Most standard issue Japanese tables of the days with the S shaped tonearms and popular cartridges of the day could not handle that one.
So what is it that makes similar very dynamic digital recordings more digestible to the masses on vinyl these days? Or also say merely loud ones with lots of loud electronic synth bass? Thinking Eminem, etc. Can the average Joe buy a record like that and be successful? Or should they just stick to streaming/digital where tracking a good quality challenging record well is not an issue and leave those records to the audiophiles to tackle? Or do the record makers these days tone it down to make it less problematic for the average Joe?
Seems to me the newer one’s taste in music, the less it makes sense to invest in vinyl because most all tend to be much louder in general these days and that includes the bass. At least that’s the case with digital/streaming format. Are newer records mastered to not be as loud? louder means more modulation...more modulation means harder to track. Am I off base there? Off course the nice thing about vinyl is always the nice packaging with a product that you can still own but that has nothing to do with the sound.
I guess I have no doubt its possible. But can can any good quality vinyl rig track those well? How hard is it and what does it take? Does it take an audiophile vinyl setup to track modern pop recordings like these well? Cost?
Just wondering. Most all my vinyl is old releases, 1980s and older so I don’t have much to go on.
I think I still have the old Telarc Firebird vinyl release from teh early days of digital vinyl mastering with the big dynamics that took a very well thought out rig to track. Most standard issue Japanese tables of the days with the S shaped tonearms and popular cartridges of the day could not handle that one.
So what is it that makes similar very dynamic digital recordings more digestible to the masses on vinyl these days? Or also say merely loud ones with lots of loud electronic synth bass? Thinking Eminem, etc. Can the average Joe buy a record like that and be successful? Or should they just stick to streaming/digital where tracking a good quality challenging record well is not an issue and leave those records to the audiophiles to tackle? Or do the record makers these days tone it down to make it less problematic for the average Joe?
Seems to me the newer one’s taste in music, the less it makes sense to invest in vinyl because most all tend to be much louder in general these days and that includes the bass. At least that’s the case with digital/streaming format. Are newer records mastered to not be as loud? louder means more modulation...more modulation means harder to track. Am I off base there? Off course the nice thing about vinyl is always the nice packaging with a product that you can still own but that has nothing to do with the sound.