Tweeter Capacitor Upgrade (Coincident PREs)

I  meant:

4uF is the border for Clarity CMR. Above that, bypassing helps, below that it does not. 
4.7 uF ..... is right close. So it's worth trying but in the end you may find it's not worth it.

Hi @cal3713 ,

Did you give break-in to Duelund bypass?
They need more then 100 hours. 

I feel 0.01uF is way to little

I have Multicap RTX bypasses (~1%) on my Clarity CSAs. On well-recorded music this sounds fantastic. Excellent transients with resolution and transparency for days. But poorly recorded music can sound "cool", even thin, most notably on vocals. I’m wondering if a double bypass or different bypass cap might add a bit more flesh or hint of warmth. The Jupiter copper foil at 0.01 uF caught my interest but your post has me second guessing. Two questions:
a) do you think a different bypass or double bypass would result in the sound I seek?
b) if yes, more likely to get a good result with Jupiter double bypass at 0.01 uF or Audyn TC Max at ~1%.

@alexberger  Yeah, everything's got about 150-200 on it.  

I'm open to bypassing, but do wonder whether I will always hear some smearing.  There's just that one capacitor between the amps and my accutons... introducing two paths of different lengths seems like it might always reduce coherence.  

@erik_squires Thanks for the suggestion on the Audyns Erik.  Depending on how the Jupiters work out, I may give them a shot.  My only hesitation is that I didn't have the problem of hearing "nothing" upon adding the lower value bypass... (see above comment)