My take on the IV is that it served a few purposes as follows:
1, I was in possession of a TA that was claimed to be competitive with the best from the era it was purchased.
2, There was a pride in having been the owner / user of the TA.
3, I was not shy to make it known I had a IV in use and did not sense the need for many years of ownership to investigate changes that could be made for it.
What changed I investigated upgrading the owned IV, from recollection there was discussions about ADEC 7 or even ADEC 9, as well as reproducing some critical parts from different materials, to be produced to extremely tight tolerances, using a very stable material and polishing this material to not usually produced surfaces finishing.
At the same time I was introduced to a TA, that had been created using a selection of the methods on the table for the IV, following the demo' of the TA compared to the IV, I was immediately convinced the IV was to be superseded, which it was.