It's like reviewing the Sophias but not the Alexandrias. Or the Quatros but not the Model 7. Or the Q3 but not the Q7. As far as everything getting a positive review, that's just a false argument IMHO. As a former reviewer I can tell you that "crap" never bubbles up to the surface to get reviewed. I reviewed dozens of products and only reviewed one that was a dog and reported it as such. Look at the review sites as a funnel that only review stuff that is getting good buzz and you'll realize why most reviews are relatively positive. Honestly, if you were publishing an audio review mag/website and heard something sounded like crap, would you want to review it? C'mon. Let's use a little common sense here. Just saying every review is positive is just easy and shallow thinking. Read what's written and you can get a lot from most reviews (except What Hifi -- they just suck and are useless IMO).
Why don't Joseph Audio Pearls get more love from the audio press?
From Neil Gader's Best of Show speaker segment from RMAF:
Best Sound (Cost No Object)
I could have gone Vandersteen, Wilson, or YG but my heart kept returning to the Joseph Pearl 3 with Berkeley Audio Design sourcing Doshi Audio power. Even in a smallish room the sound was effortless, and brimming with musicality and warmth. Take my money, please.
How is it that the Pearls, in any iteration, have -- unlike their smaller siblings -- gotten virtually no reviews from the audio press yet almost always garner lush praise from them at shows? I just don't get it, unless Jeff can't make enough of them and is too stingy to give a pair to a reviewer for a couple months. What gives???
Best Sound (Cost No Object)
I could have gone Vandersteen, Wilson, or YG but my heart kept returning to the Joseph Pearl 3 with Berkeley Audio Design sourcing Doshi Audio power. Even in a smallish room the sound was effortless, and brimming with musicality and warmth. Take my money, please.
How is it that the Pearls, in any iteration, have -- unlike their smaller siblings -- gotten virtually no reviews from the audio press yet almost always garner lush praise from them at shows? I just don't get it, unless Jeff can't make enough of them and is too stingy to give a pair to a reviewer for a couple months. What gives???
8 responses Add your response