Why So Many Raidho Speaker For Sale?


If Raidho speakers are so great, why are there so many pairs for sale here?  These are not inexpensive speakers by any means and it seems at least every other day there is a pair for sale with some people having them only a few weeks to a few months, and they are really taking a bath on them.  What gives?  Are they not as great as they are made to be?  Is Jonathan Valin a shill for the company?

I heard the 4.1 diamond at Blink High End north of Boston and was very unimpressed.  I have heard many other highly regarded speakers for much less money sounding wonderful.  So, what gives?

128x128stereo5
Even beside the price for free I would not want a Radiho. I can proof by Tru-Fi that the Pl-500 is superior to any Radiho loudspeaker.

I dare Radiho for a battle, because audio is all about shootout. The sound tells the truth, a paid review does not say a thing.

The Pl-500 outperforms the Raiho in speed and realism. I can show that in differences in height the Radiho even can’t compete.

The AMT tweeter of the P-500 is superior in all parts compared to the ribbon tweeter of the Radiho.

Beside this in stage depth and width the Pl-500 can create a much bigger stage. I want audio to be fought out in ’real’ shootouts. It is time customers get more value for their money.

I will protect the audio lovers!
I own Monitor Audio Pl500's and my friend has Raidho C3.1's. They are different and when played at low to medium volume, the Raidho's sound good to my ears. The problem is they fall apart at higher volumes. Considering how much Raidho's cost, I submit they are bad values.
When you create audio by Tru-Fi, you can use the full DNA of a loudspeaker. This makes a huge difference when you would have created your set by trial and error.

Based on properties, the differences between the Pl-500 and the Raidho loudspeakers become a lot bigger when you use the speakers at a higher level.

Audio needs parameters, now it is a loose world. Many brands use the word highend, in real it has nothing to do with it.

Using the same parameters will give a more realistic and honest view of an audio product.
Do you really think that when a loudspeaker (Raidho D-5.1) costs 225.000 dollar that it should be good? Most people will think that it needs to be awesome for this money.

Written words people see as the truth. Raidho uses the word Diamond like B&W uses the word Diamond as well. But in real we are talking about a ribbon tweeter for the Raidho and B&W is only jusing a dome tweeter.

And again I ask this question? What do you want to hear? The truth or the thing you would like to hear?

At the end there are people who will buy it. When most people have no reference frame you can sell them whatever you want. People who has the money could buy it. A nice story in an audio magazine will cover it up.

You can compare audio with the election in the US. People get the feeling that the government is not honest and never will be there for you.

Do you really think that most people in audio will be there for you? They do it most of all for their own benefit. I don’t see any protection for costomers. It is not that different compared to the government of the US.

The problem is that people are not able to look further. They focus on their life and on their pesonal needs. What does looking further really mean?

This means that you are able to think what others would think besides your own thoughts.




You know what bo1972, your constant self promotion over pages and pages is getting boring.  Not too many of us need you to save us from audio salespersons who don't have our best interests at heart and only want to turn a buck, and if you don't like our government, who cares.