Do you ever think that most of it, the adjectives you used to describe your system are nothing more than a concerted effort on your part to hear those things, aspects of sound in a wishful thinking sort of way?
It is true if someone have no idea about what is the acoustic definition of sound description, not an audiophile one, an acoustic one...
When you know what the notion means it is because you know how to create them in an optimal way with the gear you own from your speakers/room/ears relation...
Simple...
What is listener envelopment/source width ratio and how to create it and improve it in small room? it is a technical question which anser differ in applied solution for each room...
No adjectives needed here, machanical acoustic control and passive material treatment balance will do....
I can say my S.Q./price ratio is astounding, this is an adjective only, but the way i reach it with acoustic is what gives meaning to my sentence...
I dont trust any reviewer now...
They never thanks acoustic but the gear change they are motivated to speak about in the same room for years which is never optimized for a specific system ...
Anybody can buy a good amplifier, one he can afford and say it is a marvel...
But no amplifier will work marvel in a bad room... Most room if not bad are not acoustically optimal at all not optimized for a specific audio system...
Then i trust acoustic and psycho-acoustic over any reviewer which are sellers anyway nothing more...