Eminent Technology ET-2 Tonearm Owners

Slaw - fwiw - the 3 spikes on the base of the ET2 are stainless steel 10-32 cone point set screws available from any supplier. An excellent suggestion I thought from Dover to just file them down to use naked with acrylic or any other material you don’t want to mar. Ordering a few gives you options with a few different armboards.

Nandric
Try to 'isolate' your wife

Well Nikola - I am a little confused. Since Serbians according to you are known as natural born warriors, I dare not ask what the Serbian way is to isolate your wife.
I am curious though how it is done in your Netherlands.
I have taken what I consider the sub optimal way of dealing with this problem – much like a sub sonic filter, I turn on my own filter. I realize this is just a bandaid and does not solve the problem, just like a sub sonic filter.

Slaw, I braided (twisted) the wires in pairs; red/green, white/blue. I would not braid all four.

Dear Chris, The Serbian worriors already own or can buy an Kalashnikov for about $200. Those can be used for, uh, the radical 'isolation'. But the custom is to return the wife to her mother if not satisfy with, say,her cook capability.
As the passionate worriors the Serbians never missed any of the Balkans wars nor do they need any reason to start one (aka 'pure passion'). The result is an huge shortage
of young man while everybody like to have grandkids. So to get a son in law is a very difficult proposition. The logical or even more practical consequence is to offer dowry and other 'convenient' conditions to 'seduce' a young man to marry your daugther. One of those is of course the 'return warranty'. You can imagine the problems by parents with more than one daugther. So the Serbians also have the China paradox but much smaller qua extension. As you of course know no Chinese wants a daugther. Because of this fact the number of the Chinese population is not only a paradox but also an enigma.
But the Serbian case is more a look alike with the Spartan case. At some point in time just one worrior is left over.
My advice to you? You can ask her mother first if she still loves her daugther and than ask the right question.

Regards,

Dover's suggestion was a very good one that I failed to acknowledge. I appreciate all of the info I'm getting here.

I've been listening to my DIY armboard and thought I'd try to give some of my impressions. Since it's totally DIY in nature, there's really nothing to compare it to.

The materials are 3 layers consisting of: the top plate is 1/2" Purpleheart (a very dense hardwood), the 2nd layer, which I bonded to the top layer, is 3'8" Baltic birch plywood, the bottom interface, (which I view as a combination of isolation/damping), is a 1/4" sheet of engineered wood flooring underlayment. (I purposely didn't bond this layer in order to have a way to evaluate other materials in this situation). I have no idea what the actual materials are but I'm sure it's a recycled product. I experimented with it when I was constructing my motor enclosure.

I'm a self-described "shade tree mechanic" of the audio world. I don't have any scientific means of evaluating materials, just soaking in everything I've seen, heard and read about over the years, then somehow, coming up with my own variations of the above.

I'm going to try and post pictures of it temporarily on my virtual systems page, just to let you get an idea of it visually. Since it's a prototype, I didn't go for a visually pleasing product overall.

The overall sound is very, very good. I realize that there are several changes here, one is the absence of the stock tonearm/armboard interface plate. I really wanted to get rid of anything that could be a resonance inhibitor.

I'm sure you all are aware of evaluating changes in your system and how they are 'recording dependant'.

Let's start with my standby recording in which I use to evaluate any changes I make. Shawn Colvin "Steady On". I can't say it's a reference recording but it meets my criteria not only as a damn good record, but it has most of all of the aspects one would need to evaluate every aspect of a recording, IMO.

The vocals on this @ (every lp I've heard since) are spot on. No hint of any unnatural element. Actually, the vocals seem noticeably more well integrated into the whole picture. I hear no loss of detail or inner detail. What seems to be of any concern at all is, on some familiar records, there could be a slight, "rounding off or softening" of bass, though no loss of bass lines. Upon listening to Van Morrison "Moondance" Direct Disk Labs, it sounds pretty awesome! I'm wondering, given all of the unknown changes here, if this may be a factor due to the removal of the factory plate mentioned above? I realize there's more going on here than that however.

I'm really intrigued by the end result of this project, given the unknown scientific nature of the differences I'm hearing.