This has been an interesting exchange. Thanks to everyone who made the effort to constructively contribute. I'll share just one story to the mix, for whatever it may be worth.
My listening partner of 30 years is my spouse. We regularly listen to music together and we jointly listen to changes we make in our system to cross-check what we each think we may be hearing. We're both intimately familiar with the sound of our system. Over the years, we've come to a simple process that has worked for us for assessing changes:
1) Listen carefully to the current set-up on complex orchestral music.
2) Introduce the change, allowing appropriate time for break in, settling, warm-up or whatever may be needed.
3) Listen carefully again to the same music without comment.
4) Separately write down what differences, if any, we each heard.
5) Share what we separately wrote, then discuss.
6) Undo/Remove the change, re-listen and re-discuss what we hear.
Invariably, we hear the same things and invariably every change makes some difference -- occasionally very minimal, occasionally very significant. We may describe them differently, but the discussion allows us to resolve the difference in descriptive language. When we both separately describe the same sonic changes following the introduction of the change (whether component or tweak), we're pretty well satsified that what we're hearing is real.
Then it's another question to decide: Is the change for the better? Is it worth the cost? When my spouse announces that something we've tried is not leaving the house, I know for sure we have a winner! And, of course, many times the impact of any tweak is highly system and room dependent -- we've experienced that as many others have already described.
Regards,
My listening partner of 30 years is my spouse. We regularly listen to music together and we jointly listen to changes we make in our system to cross-check what we each think we may be hearing. We're both intimately familiar with the sound of our system. Over the years, we've come to a simple process that has worked for us for assessing changes:
1) Listen carefully to the current set-up on complex orchestral music.
2) Introduce the change, allowing appropriate time for break in, settling, warm-up or whatever may be needed.
3) Listen carefully again to the same music without comment.
4) Separately write down what differences, if any, we each heard.
5) Share what we separately wrote, then discuss.
6) Undo/Remove the change, re-listen and re-discuss what we hear.
Invariably, we hear the same things and invariably every change makes some difference -- occasionally very minimal, occasionally very significant. We may describe them differently, but the discussion allows us to resolve the difference in descriptive language. When we both separately describe the same sonic changes following the introduction of the change (whether component or tweak), we're pretty well satsified that what we're hearing is real.
Then it's another question to decide: Is the change for the better? Is it worth the cost? When my spouse announces that something we've tried is not leaving the house, I know for sure we have a winner! And, of course, many times the impact of any tweak is highly system and room dependent -- we've experienced that as many others have already described.
Regards,