Chris
The statement about the ET2 bearing was in relation to it being subject to the same rules regarding resonance , load carrying capability dynamic stiffness etc.
Any problems due to higher mass will manifest themselves in linear air bearing designs regardless of the manufacturer. There may be variations in degree, but they will be there.
In other words if my heavy ET has problems with cantilever flex, bass boost, phase shift and so on; so do the other heavy arms. Rockport, Walker, Kuzma. This because the horizontal effective mass is solely determined by the total weight that is moved sideways at the frequency of interest, since all of these designs are virtually frictionless.
The level of damping of course changes all this. Enter the oil trough.
The difference observed between the ET2 and the Rockport could be due to the designed operating pressure and the bearing clearance. Haven't seen a Rockport in person so this is a guess.