Timhru,
The Vandersteen's tweeter crosses over a little lower than the Soliloquy's, and does so with a more gentle slope. The Vantersteen's tweeter is a bit smaller in diameter than the Soliloquy's (1.0" vs 1.125"), and the Vandersteen's midwoofer is considerably larger in diameter (8" vs 5.25").
These factors contribute to the Vandersteen's tweeter putting out more energy to the sides than the Soliloquy's tweeter, while at the same time the Vandersteen's midwoofer is putting out less energy to the sides. So in theory at least the coloration-inducing effect of early onset reflections is likely to be worse with the Vandersteens.
If my hypothesis applies in your situation, increased toe-in should reduce the "room overload" effect by decreasing the amount of energy in that first reflection off the near side wall.
Duke
The Vandersteen's tweeter crosses over a little lower than the Soliloquy's, and does so with a more gentle slope. The Vantersteen's tweeter is a bit smaller in diameter than the Soliloquy's (1.0" vs 1.125"), and the Vandersteen's midwoofer is considerably larger in diameter (8" vs 5.25").
These factors contribute to the Vandersteen's tweeter putting out more energy to the sides than the Soliloquy's tweeter, while at the same time the Vandersteen's midwoofer is putting out less energy to the sides. So in theory at least the coloration-inducing effect of early onset reflections is likely to be worse with the Vandersteens.
If my hypothesis applies in your situation, increased toe-in should reduce the "room overload" effect by decreasing the amount of energy in that first reflection off the near side wall.
Duke