Soundstage depth and width


Which one is more important? It is the depth to me, I don't tolerate flat sound.
inna
Thats a good one , "top of the line Radio Shack " didn't no they had more than one line .
On a serious economic note; if top of the line Radio Shack was all I had, that's all I would have until things change. Good music sounds good on top of the line Radio Shack, and bad music sounds bad on top of the line high end.
The LEDR test mentioned in this article( http://www.stereophile.com/features/772/ ) basically DOES what (out to)Launche requires of a referenced sound stage. If your system resolves what the test's parameters describe; it will also resolve whatever ambient/sound staging info exists on your recordings(as far as CDs are concerned). Your other SOURCES, of course, are not in the chain, during the test(YMMV through them).
Further- This test CD(Chesky's 2nd) contains more involved image depth, height and specificity tests( http://hiendaudioshop.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/best-of-chesky-jazz-and-more-audiophile-tests-vol-2-m46/ ) Both CDs are valuable tools, if one is interested in tuning their room/system for best imaging and sound staging.
Rodman:

Thanks for the posts. I'm interested in the LEDR test CD. The article that you linked to was from 1989. Where would once obtain the LEDR CD today?

THanks.

_Ben