What is a high end stereo SUPPOSED to sound like?

Grainless, Shameless and Painless!!!

Rok2id touches on something i experienced recently and commented about on another forum. At a Shakespeare Festival here in the Hudson Valley- held in large tent open to the river on one end, pre-recorded tracks of simple music- small string section, or small choral group- sounded absolutely alive, no funny bass abnormalities, no shouty glare ala the typical PA system, although what was being used was fairly modest pro sound support: alot of small self-powered monitors, mounted high in the scaffolding, pointing in various directions, almost in an arc. Point was/is, that to me, it wasn't the 'highest end' equipment and it made me wonder about the effects of the room.
I've been using horns for the past 6 or so years, to get that sort of 'aliveness' and I agree, it is at best an illusion that sometimes works. When it does, that's what it's all about!

Audiophiles love to battle their rooms to improve room acoustics. Sometimes, certain battles can be won but in the end the room is what it is unless of course you totally change it into something else. That's true of live venues and studios during production and our rooms at home during playback.

Room acoustics can and generally are conquered to the extent needed to SIMULATE a live sound in your room, but what you get is more off an abstract Monet determined largely by room acoustics than an accurate reproduction of what things sounded like originally.

"but what you get is more off an abstract Monet determined largely by room acoustics"

Actually room acoustics and the recording production process together determine what a recording will sound like in your room and how "lifelike".

A "high end system" should be capable of fooling you with the right recording playing more times than not I would say. But in all cases it should remain true to the recording.

the problem with the term "high end", is that is a typical audiophile term.

it has no definitive definition.

if , as audiophiles, we could agreee on the definition of high end, the question raised by this thread would be answered.

the fact that there are so many responses indicates that, like other audiophile terms, its subjective in nature and either is a rhetorical question or is a matter of opinion.

i suppose then that asking the question is designed to elicit as many perspectives as possible.

as a practical matter it doesn't have any affect upon one's ability to enjoy listening to recordings.

such a question demonstrates that philosophy and "audiophilia", share many attributes.