What is a high end stereo SUPPOSED to sound like?


I've been thinking about this for a while....like 10+ years. Would be interested in what others have to say.
My latest answer would have to be "nothing". I want to hear the music and not the stereo. Like "Come over and listen to some music" versus "Come over and listen to my new stereo". If there are errors, they would be errors of omission, not commission because I assume they are less noticeable.
cdc
Here's another thing I've noticed that bears on the OP's question... When things take a leap forward in SQ in my system or one that I'm very familiar with, one of the things I often hear is a subjective "slowing" of the music.

I don't mean the kind of slowing that's associated with slow bass or bad PRaT. The "slowing" I'm talking about is a pleasing effect, though admittedly it's a difficult one to describe.

It's almost as if the recording has been LITERALLY slowed down, except of course there's no pitch shift. It's like the music is somehow more "organized," which I experience as slower.

Dunno. Maybe that's an idiosyncratic experience.

Bryon
Bryon, I too have noticed that effect. At times I've used it as a measure of whether I've really upgraded.
Same experience re slowing down - it sounds less like a mechanical reproduction and more like real instruments playing. Less forced or contrived- as a result, the perceived timing- the stuff 'in between the cracks' is more apparent. This is not 'resolution' or 'transparency' as often used in the audiophile sense, which often takes on a hyper-detailed quality, and is anything but musical.
Same here as well. I think that when we hear more of the music being played, we're simply taking in more info as there is more to the beginning and end of each note, making it seem longer when in fact the same amount of time passes but we absorb more, process more, appreciate more and since we are used to a particular piece of music, it begs comparison.

If one were to time a particular piece of music and then go back and add more instrumental playing, in the same time frame, I think it would have the same effect. We'd be processing more info, or in the case of hearing a recording better, that subtle effect would give the same results.

Or something like that.

All the best,
Nonoise
NoNoise- you hit upon another aspect of that perceived 'slowness': decay time. Many concentrate on the leading edge, when the back-end of the 'wave' is equally important (and doesn't make for stridency, either).