Mcintosh MC-352 or FPB 200 for B&W 802


I have a pair for B&W Nautilus 802's. Want to know which of the two amplifier (from used market)should I go for?

I have ML 39 CD player and have MIT shotgun speaker cables and interconnects.

Other recommendation are also welcome.
sahotas
Both of these amps can certainly push these speakers with relative ease. The 352 has a tubelike quality and a more naturalness to the music - the Krell comes right at you with an edge that (to me) I find fatigue setting in after extended periods. I have owned both and still have the 352 . Other people will of course have different takes but this is my own experience. Check audioreview.com for more personal opinions on each of these. Neither are too shabby.
I had B&W N802s and found them too bright in the high frequencies when paired up with a Krell KSA100. I then had them paired up with my (old) McIntosh MC2125 and they were darn near perfect. I would definately go with the McIntosh over Krell for B&W speakers as a result. Audition both and see but I think you will find the McIntosh beautifully liquid on 802s (especially a MC352). MIT cables definately help 802s tone down the shrill also so that was a good choice in my opinion. Arthur
B&W used the FPB600 and the FPB650M's to voice the "N" line of speakers.
My advice (and I use Krell with my B&W speakers) would be to wait until you can afford the FPB300 rather than either of the two amps you suggest. By the way, Krell advised me to do just that when I was about to purchase the FPB200. I am glad I waited.
Richard