Ait and Irish,
Thank you for your suggestions regarding the potting compound idea, and I apologize for not acknowledging your suggestions before now. I didn't immediately comprehend your suggestion, but I got it now. For this project I am not going to use the stock inductors, but constructing my own improvised CAST-like inductor with whatever new inductors I get is an intriguing idea. I may not pursue it, but I'd like to understand your idea a bit more. Since we're talking about loosely wound wires, here's my loosely wound notes and questions!:
- Is the potting compound you have in mind 3M DP270?
- I wanted to confirm, by ABS, do you mean acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, and where does one find such containers?
- I noted on the North Creek website that their inductors are varnish sealed in a vacuum chamber so that the varnish penetrates into the inner coils.
- In a previous post on this thread regarding his CAST components, Frederick mentioned, The CAST is special in the sense that we can harden it after the vacuum impregnation. If Duelund's CAST material is similar to the DP270, then I could well imagine it being a more robust compound than varnish penetrating into the inner coils, but I believe I understand why you were thinking of the potting compound as an additional step taking the inductor in the direction of the CAST system.
- I am intrigued with the idea of doing this with a North Creek inductor. Once I get my inductors measured and the dimensions of the equivalent 10awg and 12awg inductors, I'll calculate the volume of potting compound required. Perhaps an ABS tube down the center of the inductor would be okay to take up some volume, thus reducing the amount of potting compound required to cover the inductor?
- If I go with Mundorf coils it doesn't look like there's any chance of the potting compound penetrating to the inner coils, but the North Creek website mentions possible oxidation issues with foil inductors so the potting compound would certainly eliminate that issue.
This is a really neat suggestion, and as always I thank you for your time and help.
John
Thank you for your suggestions regarding the potting compound idea, and I apologize for not acknowledging your suggestions before now. I didn't immediately comprehend your suggestion, but I got it now. For this project I am not going to use the stock inductors, but constructing my own improvised CAST-like inductor with whatever new inductors I get is an intriguing idea. I may not pursue it, but I'd like to understand your idea a bit more. Since we're talking about loosely wound wires, here's my loosely wound notes and questions!:
- Is the potting compound you have in mind 3M DP270?
- I wanted to confirm, by ABS, do you mean acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, and where does one find such containers?
- I noted on the North Creek website that their inductors are varnish sealed in a vacuum chamber so that the varnish penetrates into the inner coils.
- In a previous post on this thread regarding his CAST components, Frederick mentioned, The CAST is special in the sense that we can harden it after the vacuum impregnation. If Duelund's CAST material is similar to the DP270, then I could well imagine it being a more robust compound than varnish penetrating into the inner coils, but I believe I understand why you were thinking of the potting compound as an additional step taking the inductor in the direction of the CAST system.
- I am intrigued with the idea of doing this with a North Creek inductor. Once I get my inductors measured and the dimensions of the equivalent 10awg and 12awg inductors, I'll calculate the volume of potting compound required. Perhaps an ABS tube down the center of the inductor would be okay to take up some volume, thus reducing the amount of potting compound required to cover the inductor?
- If I go with Mundorf coils it doesn't look like there's any chance of the potting compound penetrating to the inner coils, but the North Creek website mentions possible oxidation issues with foil inductors so the potting compound would certainly eliminate that issue.
This is a really neat suggestion, and as always I thank you for your time and help.
John