Frederik,
Can you please have a look at my question described a few posts earlier regarding my slightly disappointing experiences a few years ago with the 630 V Cast Cu foil caps (coupling caps in a preamp). The Cast caps had been playing for a couple of hundred hours and in the end only slightly outperformed the standard Jensen Cu foil (alu tube).
While this is quite in contrast to for instance Volleyguys experiences I wondered if this could have been the result of the fact that these Cast caps were actually the first produced by Duelund. I remember this fact very well from our emailconversations in the past. Maybe later generations of the Cast caps used different design/materials??? Very curious if this is really the case.
BTW: the tests were performed by a Dutch top designer. He got the caps on loan from the Dutch company De Audiofabriek while the guys of this company were very curious to hear from that specific designer how the performance of these caps was.
The system of the designer is of a quite high standard (see description above), the parameter the designer puts most interest in is "tonality".
The "weakest link" of the caps used in his system is Jensen and AudioNote PIO copperfoil caps. There's not any poly there.
Where the system revealed subtle differences after a long time between the alu tube Jensen PIO copperfoil and the Cast Duelund with the Cast Duelund being slightly better than the Jensen, the difference between the alu tube Jensen and the paper tube Jensen was more significant and immediate with the paper tube being clearly better than the alu tube.
Cheers,
Kees
Can you please have a look at my question described a few posts earlier regarding my slightly disappointing experiences a few years ago with the 630 V Cast Cu foil caps (coupling caps in a preamp). The Cast caps had been playing for a couple of hundred hours and in the end only slightly outperformed the standard Jensen Cu foil (alu tube).
While this is quite in contrast to for instance Volleyguys experiences I wondered if this could have been the result of the fact that these Cast caps were actually the first produced by Duelund. I remember this fact very well from our emailconversations in the past. Maybe later generations of the Cast caps used different design/materials??? Very curious if this is really the case.
BTW: the tests were performed by a Dutch top designer. He got the caps on loan from the Dutch company De Audiofabriek while the guys of this company were very curious to hear from that specific designer how the performance of these caps was.
The system of the designer is of a quite high standard (see description above), the parameter the designer puts most interest in is "tonality".
The "weakest link" of the caps used in his system is Jensen and AudioNote PIO copperfoil caps. There's not any poly there.
Where the system revealed subtle differences after a long time between the alu tube Jensen PIO copperfoil and the Cast Duelund with the Cast Duelund being slightly better than the Jensen, the difference between the alu tube Jensen and the paper tube Jensen was more significant and immediate with the paper tube being clearly better than the alu tube.
Cheers,
Kees