2. amps-preamps
  3. 1035142801

Levinson 23.5 and Biamping Gurus?

I am so far very happy using my 23.5 with newly restored Magneplanar Tympani IV'as.

The system sounds great and the amp seems to have reserves of power to where I can barely crack the volume -- even in a pretty big, very high ceilinged room.

Nonetheless, the more I read about the much smaller Maggies slurping monstrous amounts of current, I wonder if I might be missing something.

Could anyone advise me on adding a second 23.5 and bridging them? That would obviously add gigantic amounts of power and I am wondering if this would take the Maggies to new heights.

To really get fancy, maybe 23.5's bridged and Audio Research tubes on the mids/treble?

It is always fun to buy more gear but I would greatly appreciate any insight anyone might have.

Thank you.
cwlondon
6chac
235 posts
 
Hello Cwlondon,
It is not always good idea to bridge the amps. Yes, you will get more power (200Watts X 2) but you will also double the THD. Bi-amp is a better alternative, but are you willing to deal with crossovers, amps matching issues. Unless the speakers you have come with active crossover, I don't think it is worth the trouble.
cwlondon OP
1,210 posts
 
What about "bi-amping" with matching ML 23.5 amps?

Didn't mean to further confuse the issue with SS and tubes etc, but basically wanted info on the benefit of using two amps with Tympanis.
cip57
14 posts
 
Hi,
I am using mark levinson 23.5a and conrad johon premier 11a. to biamp my Tympani 4a.If you biamp your speaker, it will provide more dynamic and details.I will agree not to bridge your amp .Although 23.5a could make your speaker sound loud,it will need much more power to control your speaker to make it sing.
sof762
7 posts
 
I'm biamping my 23.5's as left and right channel.A friend is suggesting a vertical biamp.One for both bass+one for mids+highs. He also likes the idea of using an ML3 for the bass as they were "supposed" to be better at it.
Any thoughts on which is better?
More to discover