Grannyring
I found what you said about bypassing in the power supply very interesting. I was shocked when I changed out the vintage electrolytic for a new Jensen. It was more than any other change. (the vintage being that much better)
You say bypassing your electrolytic was huge improvement but not in coupling caps. Is this because the electrolytic is so poor (and maybe slow) to begin with?
Would not one high quality power supply cap be even better?
Would you like to try a paper in oil power supply cap? (just kidding)
It has been in my mind ever since hearing vintage electrolytic vs. Jensen. Jensen sounded dry the heavier vintage sounded more liquid.
I have heard even years ago McIntosh did some bypassing? (accepting the improvement) I understand that even a Leak Pre amp had a paper in oil power supply 60 years ago?
Has anyone tried the new rectifier tubes from Mullard or Gold Lion?
I found what you said about bypassing in the power supply very interesting. I was shocked when I changed out the vintage electrolytic for a new Jensen. It was more than any other change. (the vintage being that much better)
You say bypassing your electrolytic was huge improvement but not in coupling caps. Is this because the electrolytic is so poor (and maybe slow) to begin with?
Would not one high quality power supply cap be even better?
Would you like to try a paper in oil power supply cap? (just kidding)
It has been in my mind ever since hearing vintage electrolytic vs. Jensen. Jensen sounded dry the heavier vintage sounded more liquid.
I have heard even years ago McIntosh did some bypassing? (accepting the improvement) I understand that even a Leak Pre amp had a paper in oil power supply 60 years ago?
Has anyone tried the new rectifier tubes from Mullard or Gold Lion?