McCormack DNA amp options....

It's difficult to answer without knowing your speakers and their requirements.

I've owned a DNA-2 LAE and now a DNA-2 Rev A. The DNA-2 especially the Rev A are an excellent match for my Aerial 10T's which really come to life with more wpc.

If your speakers require lots of wpc, then one or two DNA-2 Rev A's or possibly two DNA-1 Rev A's should easily suffice.

Otherwise, if your speakers are more efficient, then one or two DNA-0.5's should suffice.

Don't know about converting two into monoblocks, but you most likely would be quite pleased with at least one Rev A/Rev A Gold upgrade.

-IMO

The speakers I am using are Roman Audio Centurions, they are rated at 93db. They don't require a lot of power, but will handle tremendous amounts.

I had my DNA 0.5 dlx upgraded this year to revC+, a worthwhile improvement. But if you're looking for more power, sweet as it is, the upgrade won't make the 0.5 any stronger.

It would make sense to me to get the DNA amp that by itself gives you all the power you need (dna 1 or 2), then have that one amp upgraded to revA, rather than spending twice as much for the upgrades to two separate amps, plus the monoblock conversions and the purchase price of two as well. After upgrade, the 0.5 and 1 should sound very similar, though your setup would better define whether monoblocks would offer any better sound over a single amp.

Your best resource may actually be Steve M. himself as you seem wedded to his amps to begin with: I found him very straight-up and unbiased, and certainly he knows more than any of us about how to most effectively use his amps. I might also suggest just buying a dna-225 for both power and sound for far less money...

I used to own (wish I still did) a DNA .05 that I had upgraded to the Rev. A. It was (and still is, I'm sure)an outstanding amp in every respect. SMC is very easy to deal with and Steve is easy to get in touch with. I wouldn't hesitate calling him at all. I have changed amps several times just to get different flavors for my own experience, and unfortunately I couldn't afford to keep the DNA and buy anything else. Still I have nothing but fond memories...

My op.
gb

I truly believe that the DNA .5 is overall the best sounding of the McCormack series (and yes, I have owned them all, in fact, a few more than once)The upgrade to Rev.A will remove the remaining tiny little bit of grain and allow for a touch deeper soundstage. One caveat, the revision does make changes for the better overall but it is not a leap into nirvana. I have known some who didn't like the revision when they got it back. Whether they gave it sufficient break-in I don't know. It does make a difference. Before, and I know, like me, you like McCormack, you might want to look at a few more amps before you spend the money.
To give you an example, I was using a pair of DNA .5 Deluxe amps to biamp my Vandersteen 3A Signatures. I was using an Audible Illusions preamp. I too, contemplated upgrading the 2 amps at a cost of about $2800 at the time. The amps themselves sold for $1495 each and had a current market value of about $700. I decided after reading Richard Hardesty's review of the Theta Dreadnaught to purchase one and give it a go. Man, what a move. I went with 4-200 watt modules for biamping. It was probably the best move I ever made. It enhances the basic McCormack sound to a genuine higher plateau. More transparency, bigger soundstage, pretty much, you name it. I then tried a borrowed revision A McCormack. I went to 2-ch on the Dreadnaught to make it fair. As much as I hate to say this, the comparison ended pretty quick. The bottom line for me was, the 4-ch Theta cost me $3900. A 2-ch at the time was $2700. These are with discounts through the "Sound Broker" brand new in the box. The Theta is a better sounding amp hands down!
The point is, I would look around a little before spending the bucks.
As for converting to a mono block, I would just go with the DNA 1. Even though I don't feel the DNA 1 sounds as good in direct comparison to the .5, you will negate some of the sound of the .5 doing this to where they both will sound similiar.
The new DNA's are excellent amps but I feel do not sound overall as good as the older amps. The new amps use a DC blocking cap in the input and you can hear it. They simplified the circuit somewhat.
Just my opinions for what there worth. I'm sure someone will come back with some other ideas.