MIT continued experience

Over the years, I've always found a consistent synergy with MIT cables and AQ cables when used together. I mainly use AQ DBS interconnects with MIT Shotgun speaker cables. I have stepped up to the MIT Oracle V3.2 IC's from my preamp to amp in the main rig and the use of the impedence matching network really demonstrated just how critical this function is not to mention the increased resolution and soundstage prowess the big MIT's bring.

I also use SR Resolution Reference SPEC cables for my REL subs and they match up great with the MIT speaker cables used on the main speakers. I did try a pair of AQ Volcano
DBS speaker cables and while they are very good in the resolution dept. they just don't quite have the slam and solidity that the MIT's do.

As always, YMMV.

I recently compared interconnects: MIT MA-X and Cardas Clear versus my old Audioquest Sky. I'm going with the MIT. The sound staging of the MIT is addictive.

06-26-15: Nmmusicman
Over the years, I've always found a consistent synergy with MIT cables and AQ cables when used together. I mainly use AQ DBS interconnects with MIT Shotgun speaker cables

---

Same here.

I had the full loom of either Audioquest or MITs and found a goldilocks combination using AQ Jaguar ICs with DBS and MIT Shotgun S2 speaker cables.

Been that way for a couple of years with very good results, imho, of course.

any of you guys using MIT cabling w/ THIEL loudspeakers?
I would be interested in reading about the synergy (if any)
and your listening impressions/thoughts?

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!

"07-06-15: Jafant
any of you guys using MIT cabling w/ THIEL loudspeakers?
I would be interested in reading about the synergy (if any)
and your listening impressions/thoughts?"

I would be careful. Since the signal leaving the network box is different for the highs and the lows, I would be concerned that this would have an effect on the speakers time and phase characteristics.