Badfinger


I've been listening to this album a lot lately, and it grows on me more and more everyday. While not regarded in the same class as Bafinger's Holy Trinity--"No Dice," "Straight Up," and "Wish You Were Here"--"Ass" is a remarkably good album, especially considering that it was initially rejected by Apple, which was in its death throes at the time. The songs are all of a high caliber, and even the weakest song on the set, the whimsical "Cowboy," is melodically compelling. I've always considered Badfinger one of the most underrated and undervalued bands in the history of rock. According to many, "Ass" was made when the band was in decline--when management problems, drugs, and stress within the band were exacting a heavy toll--but the more I listen to the album, the less I hear it that way. True, it's not going to make anyone forget the Big 3, but, with the right distribution and promotion, it easily could've been a hit album (as was the case with 1973's "Badfinger" and 1974's "Wish You Were Here"). But, as with most things in Badfinger's history, it all went wrong when it should've gone right. Which is a shame, because, as all of the Pete Ham--era recordings prove, these guys were superior musicians who deserved a far better fate. Guitar-based pop would not be the same without them. Maybe the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame will recognize their achievements one of these years. It's about time someone did. Any other Badfinger fans out there?
hooper
Great post! I played in a classic rock band up through the late 90's and we always included "No Matter What" and "Baby Blue" (I think we played it in C) in our club sets...real crowd pleasers. I remember people often coming up and talking about how Badfinger was one of their all time favorite bands. I agree that they should have a well deserved place in the RR Hall of Fame!
why was Badfinger always looked at as a cheap Beatles imitation? Hell Oasis was huge but not as in the groove as Badfinger. The new band Jet reminds me of Badfinger and the Faces duking it out
They were basically sponsored by the Beatles, and McCartney/Lennon wrote "No matter what." Badfinger was an alright group but to compare them to the Beatles is LOL. They played the same style of music as the early Beatles but had nowhere near equal talent whether it came to songwriting, singing, or musical growth. I do, however, prefer them to Oasis who I consider very overrated.
Wildoats:

Actually, Lennon/McCartney did NOT write "No Matter What." That was a Pete Ham composition. You're probably thinking of "Come and Get It," Badfinger's first hit, which was written by McCartney.

Though it helped in the short-term, I think in the long term Badfinger's association with the Beatles was a hindrance to their legacy. They were never allowed an identity beyond their link to the Beatles, and I think that persists to this day. They were supremely gifted musicians--four talented singers AND songwriters, just like the Beatles--and, while I don't think they were as talented as the Beatles (who was?), they were pretty damn close. If a few things had gone their way--if they had had better management; if Pete Ham and Tom Evans hadn't committed suicide; if they had been allowed an identity beyond the Beatles--who knows what their legacy would be today. But, as it stands, they're widely (and erroneously) regarded as a decent little pop band that the Beatles helped discover and which had a few hits in the early '70s. There's so much more to their legacy, but few seem to care enough to look.