Naxos, the way to go for classical?


Hello,
I need help with getting into classical. I've listened to classical with a passive interest in the past, and was somewhat intimidated by the sheer volume of materials out there. I realize this question has been raised, but I'm looking for a more specific answer; is Naxos the label to get into and stay with to become more familiar with classical music?
I have visited their website and their catalog seems very comprehensive and easy to understand. I have read on another thread that their recording quality and performances are also top notch. I am planning to build up classial library and sticking with Naxos as a way of keeping things simple. Are there other labels that I should look into? My current preferences are sound quality, performance, cost, and catalogue comprehensiveness, in those order. Please share your experiences and recommendations whether this is the right approach. My thanks in advance.
mhu
Another option for advise is the magazine, Fanfare, which reviews lots of classical recordings. It is a source of lots of great information.
I have a couple of suggestions for you. For more information about classical music and classical composers, there are two good books that you should buy and use as references:
1. "The Essential Canon of Classical Music", by David Dubal, North Point Press, 2001. A very good introduction to most of the major composers, by stylistic period, with suggestions for their best works.
2. "The NPR Guide to Building a Classical CD Collection", by Ted Libbey, Workman Publishing, 2nd Edition, 1999.

Both of these books are relatively inexpensive, and can be purchased from Amazon.com.

My second suggestion regards the Naxos label. About 18 months or so ago, I made a lengthy post here on A-gon that listed the Naxos releases that have received the most critical acclaim. Here is the link to that thread:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?rmusi&1012420599&openusid&zzSdcampbell&4&5#Sdcampbell

Good listening to you!
If sound quality is your #1 priority, don't limit yourself to only one label--Naxos or any other. Read reviews: magazines, reviews on Auudiogon or other websites (including sites that sell CDs), post questions as to what recordings are best, etc. There's no shortcut, unfortunately, since any label has its share of excellent recordings AND its share of dogs.
I am not an expert on Naxos, although I've heard a number of their CDs. Overall, I think the recording quality competitive with major labels--at a much lower price. In addition, I have yet to hear a Naxos CD that is totally unlistenable--something that I cannot say about major labels. However, their quality is not as good as the best audiophile labels. In addition, the performers tend to be people you never heard of--although this may not matter that much. (I've heard the argument that in today's world, almost everyone sounds pretty much the same.)

I agree with the others who talk about doing research. One source is _Gramophone_. This is a British magazine, but much of what gets released there is released here. I think Penguin publishes (or used to publish) comprehensive books that gave summary reviews of currently available recordings.

One recording company that I'd like to mention is Harmonia Mundi. They do mostly baroque, but they do it quite well--both performances and sound quality.

Public libraries often have a good CD collection--which may include some audiophile recordings. This would be a way to hear a variety of CDs without paying anything. Two warnings--the discs may be in poor condition (they often need a cleaning, and they often look like they've been tossed through a gravel pit). Then, there may be many old CDs from the early days of digital, which may be best avoided.
If exploring through Naxos, one nice thing is they print a very well organized and complete catalog that includes the ratings given to their recordings by some popular publications -- Penguin guide, Gramophone, etc. Don't know how easy it is to find, but I picked up a copy for free at a record store a year ago.