CARA - Room Acoustic Software


We're very much not into doing sales-pitch type posts, but after reading through several threads in this forum, we realized that questions regarding software for room acoustics were frequent enough that if we tried to answer every thread, we'd *really* feel obnoxious!

So... the lesser of two evils

CARA is a comprehensive room acoustic modelling package designed and developed by German physicist: Dr. Ulrich Thomanek. Dr. Thomanek worked with ELAC GmbH for many years and used computer models to bring their loudspeakers to be the number two in Germany.

He started ELAC Technische Software as a spinoff dedicated to his computer programs associated with loudspeaker modelling and room acoustics. CARA 2.0 is the product.

Rather than get into too many details here, I'll send you to www.cara.de where they have lots of information regarding CARA and a walkthrough. The site is in both English and German.

Early last year, Rhintek became the US representative for ETS and CARA. We have a strong background in software development, but are relatively new to the high-end audio industry. Our website is: www.rhintek.com

Thanks for your time, I'll probably be lurking around here on occasion as it looks like this forum is a good place for me to gain more understanding.

Kristin VanVranken,
Rhintek Incorporated
kristin3e25
Thanks for the input.

My question was more along the lines of whether or not the SPL diagrams were editable, given that you actually have the measured frequency response of each driver.
Psychic, i have worked doing pro sound reinforcement for a living, sold pro sound gear for a living, recorded and produced a few local bands, etc... As such, i would consider myself QUITE familiar with all of the aspects that you have mentioned.

If you would take SPL measurements in the clubs that you think sound "great", you would find that the first thing that they did was to "neutralize" peaks and dips in the room due to its' specific acoustics. This WILL vary with how crowded the club is. That's why minor adjustments are needed on a night by night basis. Once the room is somewhat "flattened out", they will administer further equilization to achieve the tonal balance that they are seeking to achieve for that specific group of entertainers.

Most "metal" or "hard rock" will get tweeked at about 80 - 120 hz with a slight emphasis between 200 - 400 hz. This adds "weight" and "body". Depending on the venue and sound that the band was looking for, sinking the 1 Khz slider down will make the vocals sound more distant and "heavier". One might also elevate the 2.5 Khz to 4 Khz range, as this would let the guitars cut through with more "bite". If cymbals were weak, you would play with the 8 - 12 Khz range. Moving this will add or subtract "splash" accordingly.

On the other hand, acts with a lot of vocals would not want the same equilization as it would come across as being muddy at the minimum and possibly even sibilant or "spitty" sounding due to the upper mid boost.

Even with all of the EQ'ing that takes place, it is next to impossible to get even sound coverage in most halls. The speaker arrays are normally not well thought out, their dispersion characteristics are not optimized, the acoustics of the room are rather eratic and the density of the crowd varies drastically. As such, trying to go for a "flat response" would be a waste of time and typically result in HORRIBLE sounding performances as it would only be "flat" in a very few spots. Most folks would rather have it be "coloured" but sound pleasant.

All of that is why home audio and pro sound are so different. We know the venue that we'll be listening in, we know the acoustics, we know where the listener will be seated, we know the appr listening levels, etc... Since most of the variables have been removed, we can then attack the problems more completely and precisely with less side effects than if one was working on a much "grander" scale.

The bottom line is that Pro Sound and home audio have very little in common other than they both use electronics to amplify and reproduce the signal. Sean
>
Albertlu wrote: "My question was more along the lines of whether or not the SPL diagrams were editable, given that
you actually have the measured frequency response of each driver."

CARA does not measure anything; it models based on input data.
Sean, Emilio was unique...his clubs were just amazing. His EQ curves did not look at all like you describe (maybe cause he claimed doing it on acid). EQ was set and covered with plexiglass. Too bad he died at an early age of an inmune defficiency...

Take the message, release the pigeon...
I have a pair of Dunlavy SC-VIs, some very high-end equipment and and a large but complex room.
I got this great accoustic simulation/optimization program CARA 2.0, but even though this program comes with a bunch of speaker models, it has no Dunlavy SC-VI model.

I have created a simple SC-VI model but it is VERY far from the frequency response of the Dunlavy SC-VI. I sent an e-mail to Dunlavy a couple of months ago asking them to make a correct model, but Dunlavy never responded.

Can somebody get Dunlavy to make this simulation model? It should not take much time and would be great given that these speakers are very sensitive to positioning and this great program does speaker position optimization IF you have a good model of the speaker.

Alternatively, does somebody have a CARA 2.0 model for the Dunlavy SC-VI that is close to the correct frenquency response? Please e-mail to vpnogueira@yahoo.com.

Thanks,

Vicente