LAMM LL2 vs. Hovland preamp

mp, what about the LL2 as opposed to the L2 for those of us who dont have 14k laying around for a preamp? maybe one that's made with kindness? love's overrated. (and expensive)

any experience with the atma-sphere mp3 line/phono?

thanks

Hello Kublakhan,
I think that the Lamm LL2 has a bit more base than the Lamm L1. If you find the Lamm L1 used or new I would buy the L1.
(What ever you do, "DO NOT AUDITION" the L2 PreAmplifier, you will be selling all your audio equipment to buy the L2 it is that amazing).
There is a dealer in New York, His name is David. His e-mail address is:DamokaNYC @ aol He is a great guy and can be trusted 200%.

The Hovland gear sure looks pretty, but every time I auditioned Hovland it was underwhelming. I heard the Saphire amp with their original preamp/phono stage and it did not leave me with any desire to pursue Hovland.

On the other hand, when I heard the Lamm LL2/LP2/ML2 combination, my audio life changed literally. The Lamm gear will get you off the merry-go-round of upgrading and searching for better gear.

Hey Kublakhan.

I have not heard these, but I've been also researching preamps similar in some ways to the LL2.
Apart from the LL2, my short list is made of (in no particular order): First Sound Presence, Atmasphere MP3, Joule Electra LA150, Conrad-Johnson ET2, Aesthetix Calypso. There's a Herron too.

Some are balanced, some only SE, some have remote, some have 2 volume pots...but all seem to focus on a rather purist design and 100% on sonics.

I hope this helps. Let us know how you move forward. As mentioned above, I'm interested in this too.

Horacio

Hello,

The Hovland is much lighter and brighter than the LAMM which is darker and fuller. The LAMM also has greater depth than Hovland equipment which paints a flatter soundstage. It would pick the one that would nudge my system in the direction I wanted to go - they do not sound alike.