****This guy was in all types of music. From Classical Orchestras, to the Cuban Army Band. I am sure this background influenced his approach to Jazz. **** - Rok2id re PDR
Bingo!
Paquito's first and most important influence was the music of his native Cuba; not to mention the influence of the culture of that country in general. He came to jazz from that direction, as opposed to the many players who were jazz players first, and later discovered Latin music and incorporated it into their repertoires. There will be a clearly identifiable flavor in the playing of musicians depending on what their primary influence was. It is a little like the accents of the spoken word of people of various nationalities; a person for whom Spanish was their first language will, more than likely, speak English (even if perfect English) with a Spanish accent.
Not only do I agree with Chazro about Paquito being a great player, but I would also point out that he is a very accomplished composer in various genres including chamber music. I bring up the above in order to possibly explain why he is not generally considered one of the greatest; not as a criticism. While I agree about the exuberance that Paquito demonstrates on his first records, this exuberance is more than anything, a reflection of simply who he is; he is a very exuberant individual in general. This exuberance, and the influence of his Latin music background in general are things that are often pointed out by die-hard jazz players as qualities that are questionable. IN GENERAL, Latin players play jazz with a unique, and readily identifiable, swing feel. There is a bit of a "ball rolling down the stairs" feel; they play much more on the front side of the beat than American jazz players who generally play with a more laid back (back of the beat). Please remember that these are generalities and certainly don't apply to all players and all circumstances. Conversely, jazz players generally bring their own unique approach to Latin music; I have been in playing situations where great jazz players had trouble sounding convincing with the unique syncopations of Latin music.
When we talk about who "the best" are, we are setting an extremely high bar. Players like Paquito, Wynton, Eddie Daniels, and others who are extremely competent in a variety of styles and genres deserve their well-earned respect, but it takes something really special to be in "the best" category; IMO.
Bingo!
Paquito's first and most important influence was the music of his native Cuba; not to mention the influence of the culture of that country in general. He came to jazz from that direction, as opposed to the many players who were jazz players first, and later discovered Latin music and incorporated it into their repertoires. There will be a clearly identifiable flavor in the playing of musicians depending on what their primary influence was. It is a little like the accents of the spoken word of people of various nationalities; a person for whom Spanish was their first language will, more than likely, speak English (even if perfect English) with a Spanish accent.
Not only do I agree with Chazro about Paquito being a great player, but I would also point out that he is a very accomplished composer in various genres including chamber music. I bring up the above in order to possibly explain why he is not generally considered one of the greatest; not as a criticism. While I agree about the exuberance that Paquito demonstrates on his first records, this exuberance is more than anything, a reflection of simply who he is; he is a very exuberant individual in general. This exuberance, and the influence of his Latin music background in general are things that are often pointed out by die-hard jazz players as qualities that are questionable. IN GENERAL, Latin players play jazz with a unique, and readily identifiable, swing feel. There is a bit of a "ball rolling down the stairs" feel; they play much more on the front side of the beat than American jazz players who generally play with a more laid back (back of the beat). Please remember that these are generalities and certainly don't apply to all players and all circumstances. Conversely, jazz players generally bring their own unique approach to Latin music; I have been in playing situations where great jazz players had trouble sounding convincing with the unique syncopations of Latin music.
When we talk about who "the best" are, we are setting an extremely high bar. Players like Paquito, Wynton, Eddie Daniels, and others who are extremely competent in a variety of styles and genres deserve their well-earned respect, but it takes something really special to be in "the best" category; IMO.