The woofer in the DQ 10s is not in an open baffle. Nice speaker, I owned it for years. You can do better, though.
open baffle vs sealed box designs
in a previous post, i asked for advice concerning stand mounted speakers.
it has occurred to me that an open baffle design may exhibit less box coloration than a sealed box.
i am not aware of any open baffle monitor speakers, other than the et lft 16 and possibly a nola design.
are there any others under $2000 which are a bit soft in the treble ?
it has occurred to me that an open baffle design may exhibit less box coloration than a sealed box.
i am not aware of any open baffle monitor speakers, other than the et lft 16 and possibly a nola design.
are there any others under $2000 which are a bit soft in the treble ?
- ...
- 9 posts total
OB need a separate low freq channel -- and it's usually a closed box. OR you need sophisticated equalisation (as in Linkwitz's Orion). BTW, I love the OB sound. So, I really don't think you'll be UNhappy with either the fostex (above-never heard them) or the Bastanis (heard these). If you're good at electronics you might have a go at the Orions (here). This speaker is world class (IMO, etc). |
Not sure what OP meant by open baffle vs sealed box, but the purpose of the baffle is to avoid cancellation of front and rear propagations from a speaker, so at low frequencies (long wave lengths) the baffle has to be quite large. Thus you expect the LF section to be a more or less sealed box of some type. Not sure what the value for HF is purported to be, or why one wold expect such an arrangement to have value. db |
- 9 posts total