The proverbial "giant killer"


As I research a new pair of speakers, I was intrigued to read about loudspeakers from companies like Triangle (France) and Swans (China). These companies seem to be offering exceptional technology at fair prices. They all manufacture their own drivers, so they are not buying standard, third-party production units and installing them in furniture grade cabinets. I’m beginning to think there are some practical explanations for their ability to offer what might be considered high-end products at a reasonable cost, one of which has a big impact; namely economies of scale.

I work for a high-end manufacturer of PC components, so amortization of costs based on production forecasts is not new to me. I also have a custom cabinetmaker as a neighbor, so I have a good idea what it would cost to construct a nice, well braced, furniture grade cabinet. I believe a big part of the reason that a small floor-standing, 2-way speaker would cost $20K is that there is a tremendous amount of research and development expenses being amortized into a very low forecast of sales. As sales volumes rise, the price of the system falls. A company like Swans, on the other hand, with massive manufacturing and sales capacity, could offer similar technology for 1/10th the price.

The reason I raise this point is that I’m curious about companies like Triangle and Swans…..Swans, for example, seems to offer “high end” products, and they even manufacture their own drivers, but their economies of scale evidently allow them to offer products at very, very competitive prices. I read where someone actually dissected a pair of Swans Diva 6.1 speakers clad in genuine rosewood, and found the parts quality (driver, crossover, cabinet construction, etc.) to be as good as the typical $20K system. Are these products overlooked by audiophiles because of their origin? Is it their low prices?

My question is, are speakers from the likes of Swans and Triangle truly “giant killer” products that are being overlooked by audiophiles for unjustified reasons?
seadweller
Good question. As I recent convert from B&W 802d to Usher BE-10 (Taiwanese) I can relate to your post. For me, I had to fight my own unjustified prejudices and preconceived notions of high end gear coming from Asia. I think the popular convention is that Asia is only good for high quantity, low quality products. Yes, historically Asia has been great at producing things cheaply. But recently, we have seen higher quality products coming from Asia. I personally do believe Asian high end audiophile products have begun to and will continue to change the landscape of our hobby. I am a firm believer in competition as a catalyst for innovation in terms of technology and price. Now some people will make mention of the unfair advantage Asia has in the wages it pays its employees. I agree that this is a built in adavantage but every manufacturer will have to deal with it because Asia is not going away. The end result is better products at better prices. So in a nutshell, I absolutely believe high end products can (and it has already started to) come from Asia.
My question is, are speakers from the likes of Swans and Triangle truly “giant killer” products that are being overlooked by audiophiles for unjustified reasons?
I've not heard Swans. I've heard Triangle speakers on several occasions. With the right amp, and in the right room, they can sound good...but I would not own them. FWIW, I don't find any speaker to be a 'giant killer'.
I don't believe there is such a thing as a "giant killer." You have to match any speaker to the room and then match the amplifier to the speaker. You can take a very expensive speaker and make it sound bad very easily. OTOH, you can take a moderately inexpensive speaker and make it sound great with some work.

Triangles can take a lot of work but if you put forth the effort, they will reward you in a big way. Don't give them the effort they require and they will bite you. So yes, they are fantastic speakers in the right circumstances. Never heard of Swan.