Thank you Al. I thought there is always going to be a direct causal effect of actual amp speed and subjective/sonic speed. That's very interesting. I understand the obvious descriptors of a really good amp but there's another effect/indicator of subjective speed which is observable. It may be that I have a too limited perspective on what transient performance is. The things I'm referring to are effects of ambiance being injected where you can hear it's instantaneous up front presence less subtly than the engineer may have intended probably expecting it not to be noticeable, and maybe with a sparkling almost grainy effect. As if you can hear that sound being constructed. Also for example a string being stretched or when they are sliding up or down the neck of the instrument, or soft consonants like the word 'you' for example where after the initial attack the remainder of the tone is so consistently immediate as to convey the same sense of speed as the transient. Or the precisely contained decay of a kick drum where you can hear reverberations clearly/sharply. Or even a trombone doing it's thing with a sense of strength and immediacy that denotes speed. I have a pair of Meridian 105s that are uncanny in their ability to convey this sense of speed. I also have a pair of the famed LOW TIM LSR&D Superamp monos designed by the late Dr. Marshall Leach of Georgia Tech. Although they both display equally competent transient performance, the Meridians have that sense of immediacy that raises them a notch above. I also have a GAS500 that has this sense of immediacy but not quite as fast in transient performance.
If the relationship between technical parameters and subjective perception is indirect or vague, then how does someone set out to design a 'subjectively fast' amp? Is it just a crap shoot? Technically, what descriptors must an amp possess in order to facilitate subjective speed? Isn't this the goal?
I do recognize those here with knowledge and pay attention to their conversations. But it's you and Ralph who seem to stand out among the others for me.
If the relationship between technical parameters and subjective perception is indirect or vague, then how does someone set out to design a 'subjectively fast' amp? Is it just a crap shoot? Technically, what descriptors must an amp possess in order to facilitate subjective speed? Isn't this the goal?
I do recognize those here with knowledge and pay attention to their conversations. But it's you and Ralph who seem to stand out among the others for me.