Bob_R
"..no laptop..."
Bob I suppose, one could borrow a girl friend's laptop or just 'a' friends, over the weekend or ask them to drop by for a couple hours and bring it along..
If one goes with a mic... any suggestions there?
== = = = = = = = = = =
Others
Do you need to afix some tube surrounding the mic.. or just how fancy does one need to get in this area. Won't a tri pod for the mic work just fine?
OK... so you get the software, mic/RS meter, Laptop, and take every measurement known to man and some as yet unknown perhaps... What then?
I can appreciate the input here and elsewhere as to attending to bass irregularities, and reflections, using traps and diffusers. What physical paraphernalia, apparatus, and so forth are used thereafter to attend to the frequency range above 200 - 300Hz??
Seems to me with the addition of physical structures, DIY stuff, etc. at best its a guessing game then, deciding which, what, where and how much of this or that.
Wouldnt using electronic means to adjust for the anomalies be the best and shortest path to a positive solution in the acoustic treatment realm? As much as others seem to preclude such added componentry to the signal If one doesnt want to clutter up the listening room with all these sonic attenuators & diffusers which are a non exacting process and far from one of simplicity, it would appear at least a more succinct and quite pertinent resolution for the majority of listeners without looking into it too deeply.
Are these electronic EQs such poorly voiced or non transparent, devices, or so immensely over priced components, most audio nuts will shy away from them and pursue the haphazard mechanical avenue instead?
Or should the entire idea of using electronic equalization be revisited, surely, at some greater length?
BTW just how musical is a flat room anyways? Not owning one, nor knowingly having not been in one, I have to ask/wonder.
"..no laptop..."
Bob I suppose, one could borrow a girl friend's laptop or just 'a' friends, over the weekend or ask them to drop by for a couple hours and bring it along..
If one goes with a mic... any suggestions there?
== = = = = = = = = = =
Others
Do you need to afix some tube surrounding the mic.. or just how fancy does one need to get in this area. Won't a tri pod for the mic work just fine?
OK... so you get the software, mic/RS meter, Laptop, and take every measurement known to man and some as yet unknown perhaps... What then?
I can appreciate the input here and elsewhere as to attending to bass irregularities, and reflections, using traps and diffusers. What physical paraphernalia, apparatus, and so forth are used thereafter to attend to the frequency range above 200 - 300Hz??
Seems to me with the addition of physical structures, DIY stuff, etc. at best its a guessing game then, deciding which, what, where and how much of this or that.
Wouldnt using electronic means to adjust for the anomalies be the best and shortest path to a positive solution in the acoustic treatment realm? As much as others seem to preclude such added componentry to the signal If one doesnt want to clutter up the listening room with all these sonic attenuators & diffusers which are a non exacting process and far from one of simplicity, it would appear at least a more succinct and quite pertinent resolution for the majority of listeners without looking into it too deeply.
Are these electronic EQs such poorly voiced or non transparent, devices, or so immensely over priced components, most audio nuts will shy away from them and pursue the haphazard mechanical avenue instead?
Or should the entire idea of using electronic equalization be revisited, surely, at some greater length?
BTW just how musical is a flat room anyways? Not owning one, nor knowingly having not been in one, I have to ask/wonder.