Magico Mini II vs. Magico V2 comparison

I heard all the magico's at my dealer. The V3's are nice but at the price point, ridiculous. Even a piano is tough to squeeze thru box drivers, let alone an orchestra. All you have to do is listen. Remember, I'm not talkin about your fathers Maggies....I'm refering to the 3.6R's(with the re-worked crossovers) and 20.1's.

Hey Dave b....no disrespect,but I have heard "that" box arguement on "so" many occassions I can't keep up with it!

In today's world,with the type of technology available,it is an "old news" story.A well designed box can be superb!!The Magico stuff is a testament to that...but...

Going further back in time(like the 1990's)the "original" Avalon company(headed by Charles Hanson,now of Ayre)made a speaker called the Ascent MK-II.It was imo,the original Magico(massive sealed cabinet,totally inert,and with amazing external crossovers,not to mention easy load on an amp,and stunning inner detail...."if set up well")and as of last year(when I sold my pair)it was about as good as a speaker got,"based on commensurate room size,and driving it properly",in a givin space.

It was tricky to get just right,but I swear that was "one great speaker".WAY ahead of itself,and those selling it(me included....but I was forced to)had no clue of how much more "it" could get out of a well matched system....."The box thing" was laughably a non issue,as it "is" with Magico and a few other top notch designs around today.

Personally,I like to be open minded,and favor some designs that fly under the radar....until they get a review and Kaboom,the prices go up!

I specifically remember recommending the Mini's to a particular poster(on this thread) about two years ago(just before the BIG reviews)because on paper it seemed superb(which it "is")but the fellow would not show any interest,until the press started to tout it,and it got the rave reviews.Just being a great design was not enough.

"Nothing wrong there,and human nature,I guess".

Yet it's nice to think outside the box(or non box) and consider the fact that there is a load of very fine products out there,if one has good buying instincts.

Boxes can be great!It's up to the mfgr to "do it" properly(but at that level they are expensive).Of course,one can argue for designs like Maggie,Martin Logan or Quad etc,and you'd not get an arguement from me.

I've heard it all,and am very open to anything that works....to my taste -:)

Rather than criticize folks for being a bit contrary,it can also serve as a potential learning experience to "consider" the alternatives.

Then if something seems interesting,take it to another level and check out the website/design objective,and maybe scope out a source for an audition.Makes sense to me,and with today's escalating high end audio prices,the only approach I'll attempt.

Best

Every speaker has drawbacks and limitations.

Buy/own the design which meets the budget, maintains matrimonial harmony, and maximizes your listening enjoyment.

IMO

I agree and have owned and enjoyed some very conventional designs. Acoustic instruments just seem to sound a bit more natural and uncompressed through say a planar speaker. It's all relative of course.

>>11-01-09: Dave_b
Acoustic instruments just seem to sound a bit more natural and uncompressed through say a planar speaker<<

Possibly.

But a bass drum or pipe organ won't.

Every speaker is a trade off of some sort.