One aspect of the London/Decca cartridge design that influences arm choice is the differing lateral vs. vertical compliance figures, they being 10 X 10 (-6) cm/dyne Vertical and 15 Lateral. I know the ET arm has differing moving mass figures in the two planes, but whether or not they align (or conflict) with the London compliance figures I don't know. Whatever arm is used with London's, it has to have as stiff and non-resonant an arm tube as possible, and the best bearings one can afford. That benefits all cartridges of course, but London's put a LOT of energy into the arm.
Another thing to know about the cartridge is that it likes to be loaded with unique amounts of resistance and capacitance. The Reference model is at it's best with 15k resistance and about 220 pF capacitance. I was tutored in Decca's in the 80's by Harvey Rosenberg, and he liked the Decca's of that time with a LOT of capacitance, like 0.5 mF!
Another thing to know about the cartridge is that it likes to be loaded with unique amounts of resistance and capacitance. The Reference model is at it's best with 15k resistance and about 220 pF capacitance. I was tutored in Decca's in the 80's by Harvey Rosenberg, and he liked the Decca's of that time with a LOT of capacitance, like 0.5 mF!