AAC is compressed like MP3 (but better sound quailty). WAV doesn't have ability to store metadata (track names etc.). AIFF shouldn't have any options, being uncompressed. Your choice is between Apple Lossless (ALAC) and AIFF. ALAC is about 50% smaller than AIFF. I store everything in ALAC because I use Apple computer and Iunes, but also because my wireless streaming to Airport Express uses ALAC as format (avoiding additional conversion). Be advised, that ALAC and AAC files have the same extension .mp4 and the only way to distinguish between the is to read file info in I tunes or compare the size (AAC will be many time smaller). On my phone and in my car I use AAC 256kbs VBR.
AIFF vs Apple Lossless Ripping
I have a large music collection that I have ripped using Apple Lossless and error correction turned on. I have recently seen several postings saying that AIFF (with error correction turned on)is the way to go. Would anyone care to address the superiority of AIFF vs Lossless, and if possible, explain why one would potentially be better than the other? And, if AIFF results in a larger file, approximately how much larger (percentage). I'm trying to decide if it's worthwhile to re-rip a 1400 cd collection.
- ...
- 42 posts total
- 42 posts total