Neutral electronics are a farce...


Unless you're a rich recording engineer who record and listen to your own stuff on high end equipment, I doubt anyone can claim their stuff is neutral.  I get the feeling, if I were this guy, I'd be disappointed in the result. May be I'm wrong.
dracule1
Auratones…man…and I think the only valid explanation of NS10s is everybody had them, but I have never been able to stand those damn things…they give me a headache. Note that mastering has a huge impact on the final sound…luckily…Bob Ludwig, et al…save the day often.
In a very early Stereophile, Gordon Holt (a good recording engineer himself) showed a graphic equalizer as it was adjusted in a studio during a recording. He then showed the measured frequency response of the monitors in the studio. He pointed out that the equalizer settings were the exact inverse of the frequency response of the speakers---the engineer was using the equalizer to correct the frequency response of the speakers! The problem is, that equalization was applied to the tape, so when the recording was played on a speaker that didn’t require EQ’ing, the recording would sound like that inverse of the monitor speaker. In order to sound right, the recording HAD to be played on that studio monitor loudspeaker, and it alone! In many studios, since each speaker in the monitor booth makes a recording sound different, with no definitive reference to live sound, the engineer will adjust the EQ until the recording sounds about equally "good" (whatever that means to the engineer) on all the monitors. Oy!
If you can eliminate glare, etch, boom, bloat, and minimize sibilance and room interactions, then you can get consensus on something that approaches "neutral". 

It's all a recreation done to your liking which makes it possible for enjoying the music instead of listening for the music. I think that "neutral" has a pretty big soft spot to hit so all you have to do it be careful to rid yourself of the annoying artifacts and leave it at that.

All the best,
Nonoise