Agree with Yogiboy on this one . Having owned both the P3s and the C7s, I found the P3s to be clearer and more open sounding. The C7s, were a bit muddier though the midrange due to the port and the box resonance. Both are beautiful speakers, but the P3 is a startlingly good monitor. And the bass was more than enough in my 12x15 room. Can't imagine you'd be disappointed in any way by going with the P3s.
Harbeth P3ESR or Monitor 30?
I’m leaning strongly towards a (used) Harbeth upgrade, and was focussed on the P3ESR until I noticed a pair of Monitor 30s available for around the same price.
My room is far from ideal. Hard floors, about 15'x18', with a further, narrower extension on one side of the longer dimension, and a small window bay on the other. The speakers are set up on one side of the 15' space, and I sit on the other.
I have done some searching and read a few opinions, but if anyone has experience with both, or any thoughtful opinion, I’d welcome your thoughts.
Cheers,
Tony
My room is far from ideal. Hard floors, about 15'x18', with a further, narrower extension on one side of the longer dimension, and a small window bay on the other. The speakers are set up on one side of the 15' space, and I sit on the other.
I have done some searching and read a few opinions, but if anyone has experience with both, or any thoughtful opinion, I’d welcome your thoughts.
Cheers,
Tony
- ...
- 46 posts total
Whipsaw, I still have them and I drive them with 70 watt tube Quicksilver amps! This review says it all! http://www.hifizine.com/2011/12/harbeth-p3esr/ |
Yep, I think the line "For those who tell you that these little monitors do not deliver bass below a certain frequency I say stop listening to Hertz and start listening to music" says it all. I bet they sound fantastic with the Quicksilver amps. I found that they sound good with damn near anything, but high-quality amplification really brings them to another level. |
- 46 posts total