Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10

Frogman, I am subjective to the Nth degree when it comes to selecting and listening to jazz music. If I detect 1 objective hair on my body, I will pull it out.

My musician friend who lived with me that Summer, never practiced (that Summer). What was an improvising, performing jazz musician going to practice? He didn't just start playing jazz yesterday.

Although I had been a fan of his eight years before he moved into my apartment, I had never heard the music he was currently playing. I was truly mesmerized at each performance, never the same music. We never talked music before or after the performance. He enjoyed telling me about his life as a professional jazz musician, and I enjoyed listening.

That was 40 years ago. When I reflect back to that time, I know there was something intensely personal between him and his "new" music. When he was on stage, he went to that place where jazz musicians go; that's where it's at, either you got it or you don't; he just let his fingers fly trusting his inner muse, there was nothing "objective" about that.

I recall that he played center stage at that big 4th of July extravaganza we have under the arch every year here in St. Louis, and got rave reviews. I didn't attend, I can't stand being in the midst of a bazillion people.

The only thing I've got to personally compare, is when I went out on the tennis court and hit perfect backhands and forehands. I wasn't thinking about anything, I just kept my eye on the ball. Of course I had spent years playing and practicing before this occurred, but it would not have occurred if I had been "objectively" conscious of what I was doing.

I witnessed on TV, the best game Isaih Thomas (Detroit Pistons) ever played in his life. When he got so tired that he barely got across the half court line, he threw the ball up, and nothing but net; he couldn't miss.

After the game news people were all over him; he said everything was like in slow motion and he was in what they call, the zone.

Here is where I'm coming from, if you're going to be a star jazz musician, you have got to quit thinking "objectively" about what you're doing; either you got it or you don't, but you can not get it by practicing (when you're a performing musician) That might be just the thing for a "classical" musician, but not an improvising jazz musician.

Of course if you're not performing, you have to practice; but an improvising jazz musicians performance has to be instantaneous; otherwise it sounds "stilted", and that's not good in jazz.


Enjoy the music.




O-10, we've been down this road way too often and I don't know how or why you got on the subject of practicing; it has little to do with the subject of objectivity and would be applicable to musicians in any genre, not just jazz.  With all due respect you are simply mistaken in making connections that don't exist, and it demonstrates why some of these discussions become so strained.   I won't beat a dead horse and can only suggest that you not be so quick to pull those hairs out.  But, since you brought up the subject of practicing:

"If I don’t practice for a day, I know it. If I don’t practice for two days, the critics know it. And if I don’t practice for three days, the public knows it." - Louis Armstrong
Posting this for the benefit of the Great Unwashed,  so we can follow this 'ruckus'.


sub·jec·tive1
/səbˈjektiv/ adjective
  1. based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions: Contrasted with objective.
  2. synonyms:personal, individual, emotional, instinctive, intuitive

ob·jec·tive1/əbˈjektiv/ adjective
  1. (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts: Contrasted with subjective.
  2. synonyms:impartial, unbiased, unprejudiced, nonpartisan;  More

Don't see why there should be any disagreement.   Each point of view is valid.

Cheers

Frogman, Improvise means to create and perform spontaneously or without preparation.  Improvise comes from the Latin word improvisus, meaning "unforeseen, unexpected." Think about when something unexpected happens to you — you have no choice but to react in the moment, or improvise.

I'm sure he, (meaning my musician friend), practiced so much that he could visualize his instrument in his sleep during his formative years. Why do so many musicians play with their eyes closed? That's because they don't need to even see the thing their playing, even when it's as complex as a "Koto". I saw June Kuramoto play the Koto most of the night with her eyes closed; she was playing improvisational jazz better than on any records I have of "Hiroshima"; with her eyes closed, I even have pictures.

You see classical musicians practicing morning noon and night; I'm sure it must be necessary; but if you are going to be improvising, playing new music that you have in your head, what are you going to practice? When improvising, each note you play, depends on the note someone else played before you; that's why good jazz musicians sound so good, because if you play a wrong note, someone else can play a note that will make it sound good, and it all comes out sounding beautiful.

Although you keep harping on the "fact" that my friend did not practice when he was performing at least three nights a week; the elephant here is "improvisation"; that's the ability to create "spontaneously"; either you got or you don't, but no amount of practice will enable you to do this.




Enjoy the music.